Aniconism in the first centuries of Christianity

Bibliographic Data

ID4372457
AuthorsRobin M Jensen (Department of Theology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, USA, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume47
Issue3
Pages408-424
Publication date2017-07-03
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueReligion (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0048-721X • E-ISSN: 1096-1151
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/0048721x.2017.1316357
OpenAlexW2607455959
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited18

Scholars generally agree that Christian iconography emerged only in the 3rd century. The absence of earlier, unambiguously Christian artifacts led many scholars to characterize Christians as initially aniconic largely in deference to biblical prohibitions of graven images and to regard the pictorial art’s emergence as a departure from the church’s original disapproval. This essay argues that classical philosophical arguments were even more influential on Christian condemnation of divine images than biblical texts and that when it emerged, Christian art essentially served non-idolatrous didactic rather than devotional purposes. Finally, this essay maintains that the demise of polytheism (and its perceived idolatry) changed both the circumstances and content of the debate over divine images. Whereas earlier censure mainly contended that manufactured objects were incapable of representing an invisible God, later criticism focused more on the problems of representing Christ’s human and divine natures and whether saints’ portraits were proper foci for prayer and veneration

Art · Art history · Christian art · Christianity · Criticism · Deference · Depiction · Divine Providence · Iconography · Idolatry · Literature · Paganism · Portrait · Prayer · Theology · Veneration · Byzantine Studies and History · Historical and Religious Studies of Rome · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · Law · Philosophy · Religious studies

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub