Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Is Mimetic Theory in Literature and Art Universal

Bibliographic Data

ID4375153
AuthorsMing Dong Gu (0000-0001-8952-5978, Rhodes College, corresponding author)
Year2005
Volume26
Issue3
Pages459-498
Publication date2005-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePoetics Today (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0333-5372 • E-ISSN: 1527-5507
PublisherDuke University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1215/03335372-26-3-459
OpenAlexW2102565648
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited13

Mimesis is one of the most fundamental ideas in Western poetics. Mimetic theories constitute a mainstream in Western aesthetics. In comparative studies of Chinese and Western poetics, however, there exists a widely accepted opinion that mimetic theory is a cultural invention unique to the Western tradition. And on this scholarly consensus has been constructed a fundamental dichotomy, ramifying into a series of binary oppositions: the metaphorical,figurative, transcendental nature of Western art, as against the metonymic,literal, immanentist nature of Chinese art. Critically reviewing the comparative studies of mimetic theory, this article argues against the accepted opinion. By examining various ontological and epistemological aspects of mimesis in the Chinese tradition in relation to the West, this article reestablishes imitation as a transcultural human instinct and mimetic theory in art as a universal idea across cultural traditions. It also examines how the artistic ideal is conceived of in Chinese and Western representation, how Chinese mimetic theory differs from its Western counterpart, and what implications an understanding of the differences may have for the comparative study of Western and non-Western literatures

Art · China · Chinese philosophy · Epistemology · Instinct · Linguistics · Literature · Mainstream · Metaphor · Metonymy · Poetics · Poetry · Sociology · Transcendental number · Western culture · Western literature · Western thought · Chinese history and philosophy · History · Japanese History and Culture · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Philosophy

  • Mimetic Theory in Chinese Literary Thought

    Ming Dong Gu•New Literary History•2005

  • Ancient Greece, early China

    Open Access•Jeremy Tanner•The Journal of Hellenic Studies•2009

  • Decentering Sinas

    Lucas Klein•Journal of Chinese Literature and…•2022

  • Ancient China and its anthropological significance

    Open Access•Kwang‐chih Chang, Kwang-Chih Chang•Archaeological Thought in America•1989

  • Early Civilization in China

    Paul S Ropp•Heritage of China•1990

  • The Aesthetics of Mimesis

    Open Access•Stephen Halliwell•Aesthetics of Mimesis•2009

  • Towards a Critical Theory of Chinese Narrative

    Andrew H Plaks•Chinese Narrative•1987

  • Anticipating China

    David L Hall, Roger T Ames•Anticipating China•1995

  • Pursuing The Complete Bamboo in The Breast

    Michael A Fuller, Michael Fuller•Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies•1993

  • Illusion, Lie, and Metaphor

    Martin Svensson Ekstroem•Poetics Today•2002

  • On the Genesis and Development of Literary Systems

    Earl Miner•Critical Inquiry•1978

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,14
Citation span2005 - 2022 (18)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae