Poiesis as Decision Making
Shklovsky, Tynianov, Bakhtin
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4375499 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Peter Steiner (0000-0003-1076-2626, University of Pennsylvania, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 499-517 |
| Publication date | 2021-12-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Poetics Today (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0333-5372 • E-ISSN: 1527-5507 |
| Publisher | Duke University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1215/03335372-9356823 |
| OpenAlex | W3216574551 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 10 |
This article deals with the theories of Viktor Shklovsky and Iurii Tynianov from the perspective of decision science. It outlines how these two members of the Petersburg Society for the Study of Poetic Language (OPOIAZ) conceived of the writer as a rational agent pursuing a specific goal, and of the means at his or her disposal to attain it. Their approaches, the article illustrates, correspond closely with two specific types of rationality: "instrumental" and "bounded." To conclude, the essay juxtaposes the formalists' conceptualization of poetic creativity with Mikhail Bakhtin's view on the subject, arguing that the way he conceives of the strategies available to the literary author fits the label of "interactive rationality
Art · Conceptualization · Creativity · Epistemology · Linguistics · Literature · Poetry · Rationality · Sociology · Computer Science · Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity · Philosophy · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism · Psychology · Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies · Social Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
| Highly cited | No |
|---|