Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Moken traditional knowledge

An Unrecognised Form of Natural Resources Management and Conservation

Bibliographic Data

ID4388952
AuthorsNarumon Arunotai (0009-0002-2998-2514, Chulalongkorn University, corresponding author)
Year2006
Volume58
Issue187
Pages139-150
Publication date2006-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Social Science Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-8701 • E-ISSN: 1468-2451
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1468-2451.2006.00599.x
OpenAlexW1995619766
LanguageEN
Citations received14
References cited4

This article presents the traditional knowledge of an ethnic group of sea nomads generally known in Thailand as Chao Lay. The Moken once led a nomadic marine life. They have developed their traditional knowledge and belief system over several centuries. This practical knowledge has been obtained through interaction with local ecosystems and from observation and experimentation in everyday life. The Moken have intimate knowledge relating to the sea and the forest, and they have elaborated boat-building skills and other technologies that allow them to make their living from the sea, coastal areas, and islands. This traditional knowledge and attendant practices represent a form of natural resources management and conservation. It comprises: 1) knowledge and skills that depend upon simple technologies that have minimal impact on the natural environment and its resources; 2) a nomadic life with frequent displacements that allow the Moken to rotate their foraging grounds and prevent overuse and degradation of specific areas; 3) knowledge about numerous forest and marine species - their characteristics, behaviour, habitats and eco-niches - which enables the Moken to make use of a diversity of local ecosystems; 4) a hunter-gatherer livelihood focusing primarily upon subsistence, with little accumulation of material goods, and finally 5) a philosophy and belief system that holds that natural resources are not individually owned, but rather are to be shared by everyone without restrictions on access. The sharing ethic is very strong in the Moken community and resources are shared not only with fellow humans but with supernatural beings as well. This system of traditional knowledge, know-how and representations has never been recognised nor respected. Rather than a form of natural resources management and conservation, it has been misinterpreted as part and parcel of a "primitive", underdeveloped, and materially poor livelihood. For mainstream society, development for the Moken necessarily requires the termination of their "primitive" life and the embracing of modernity. Through this pathway to development, however, the Moken are likely to lose their traditional knowledge and the sustainable livelihood that has ensured their physical and cultural well-being for centuries

Agriculture · Biology · Business · Diversity (politics) · Economics · Environmental ethics · Environmental resource management · Geography · Indigenous · Livelihood · Marine conservation · Natural (archaeology) · Natural resource · Natural resource management · Sociology · Subsistence agriculture · Traditional knowledge · Culinary Culture and Tourism · Ecology · Indigenous Studies and Ecology · Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies

  • Exploring culture-based learning for Moken hunter-gatherer children

    Jason Sanglir•Hunter Gatherer Research•2019

  • Trapped in Place: Changing Mobility Patterns and Lifestyles of Thai Moken

    Open Access•Lukas Christian Husa, Kwanchit Sasiwongsaroj et al.•Journal of Ethnic and Cultural…•2026

  • Why local people do not support conservation

    Open Access•Nathan J Bennett, Philip Dearden•Marine Policy•2014

  • Fisherfolk of the floating homes

    Bhanu Sandeep Jartha, Reshma Gills et al.•Local Environment•2025

  • Human migration and marine protected areas

    Open Access•Garth Cripps, Charlie J Gardner•Geoforum•2016

  • Spatial dysfunction in post-tsunami Baan Lion

    D Mcduie-Ra, Daniel F Robinson et al.•Geoforum•2013

  • Hybrid identities

    Daniel F Robinson, Danielle Drozdzewski•Identities•2015

  • “Something Sacred, Something Secret”

    Open Access•Apurba Krishna Deb•Journal of Ethnobiology•2015

  • Community-based scenario planning

    Open Access•Nathan J Bennett, Alin Kadfak et al.•Environment Development and…•2016

  • Elusive wild foods in South East Asian subsistence

    Open Access•Alison Weisskopf•Quaternary International•2018

  • Shell‐Dense Island Off Culasawani, Vanua Levu Island, Fiji

    Open Access•Patrick Nunn, Patrick D Nunn et al.•Geoarchaeology•2026

  • Citizenship and statelessness among mobile maritime populations

    Janepicha Cheva-Isarakul, Christoph Sperfeldt•Citizenship Studies•2023

  • Tsunami survivors' perspectives on vulnerability and vulnerability reduction

    Open Access•Marylynn Steckley, Brent Doberstein•Disasters•2011

  • Thick perception

    Open Access•Zachary J Chase, G A Thompson•Ethos•2025

  • Sacred Ecology

    Fikret Berkes•Sacred Ecology•2026

  • Aborigines and Fire in the Wet Tropics of Queensland, Australia

    Adelaide Baird Rosemary Hill, Adelaide Baird Davi Rosemary Hill•Society & Natural Resources•1999

Citations per year0.93
Citation span2011 - 2026 (16)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae