Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The instrumental Brahmin and the "half-caste" computer

Astronomy and colonial rule in Madras, 1791-1835

Bibliographic Data

ID4392210
AuthorsPavan Kumar (0000-0001-9467-5364, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume61
Issue3
Pages308-337
Publication date2023-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHistory of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0073-2753 • E-ISSN: 1753-8564
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/00732753221090435
PMID35466747
OpenAlexW4224860701
LanguageEN
Citations received6

What did science make possible for colonial rule? How was science in turn marked by the knowledge and practices of those under colonial rule? Here I approach these questions via the social history of Madras Observatory. Constructed in 1791 by the East India Company, the observatory was to provide local time to mariners and served as a clearinghouse for the company's survey and revenue administration. The astronomical work of Madras' Brahmin assistants relied upon their knowledge of jyotiśāstra [Sanskrit astronomy/astrology], and can be seen as a specialized form of the kind of South Indian scribal labor and knowledge that also staffed the company's tax offices. If at Greenwich the division of labor meant observatory work bore resemblances to the factory and the accounts office, in Madras, astronomy and accounting drew on similar labor forms because they were part of the same enterprise. But the company did not just adapt preexisting forms of labor, it also attempted to produce its own at a school built near the observatory to train "half-caste" orphans as apprentice surveyors and assistant computers. The school, staffed by the Brahmins, drew upon knowledge and pedagogical practice associated with the tinnai, the schools in which upper-caste children learned to read, write, and calculate. For a time, the observatory's social order was literally "half-caste." The paper also considers how the relationship between caste, status, and instrument was reflected in the visual and material culture of the observatory, such as in Indian-language inscriptions on its central pillar. For company astronomers, the measurement of time meant reworking the relationships among the Indian past, the colonial present, and an imperial posterity. Science under colonial rule spanned multiple temporal and social registers because it was the result of negotiations between the demands of political economy and the knowledge and practices of colonized others

Ancient history · Archaeology · Astronomy · Caste · Colonialism · Geography · Greenwich · Observatory · Physics · Political science · Sociology · Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies · Geology · History · History and Developments in Astronomy · History of Science and Medicine · Law

  • When Is Medicine

    Open Access•Eric Moses Gurevitch•Journal for the History of…•2023

  • A Railway Carpenter in the History of Technology

    Open Access•Agostino Lanzillo•History Compass•2024

  • Texts, Practice and Practitioners

    Open Access•Senthil Babu D, D Senthil Babu•Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschicht…•2022

  • Neo-colonial narratives in modern migration

    Open Access•Dhara Patel•Current Sociology•2026

  • George Biddell Airy and Information Management at the Royal Observatory, Greenwich

    Yuto Ishibashi•Isis•2025

  • "Too Much" Sand, Not Water

    Open Access•Pandey•Cultural Anthropology•2024

Unique citing works6
Citations per year1.5
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae