Placing plants on paper
Lists, herbaria, and tables as experiments with territorial inventory at the mid-seventeenth-century Gotha court
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4392365 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alix Cooper (Stony Brook University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 257-277 |
| Publication date | 2018-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | History of Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0073-2753 • E-ISSN: 1753-8564 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0073275318776515 |
| PMID | 29909654 |
| OpenAlex | W2809347603 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
Over the past several decades, historians of science have come increasingly to focus on the role of so-called "paper technologies," reorganizing and transforming information through the use of paper and pen, in the emergence of modern science. Taking as a case study an effort by administrators in the seventeenth-century German princely state of Saxe-Gotha to enlist foresters and herb-women to catalog the medicinal plants of the territory, this article analyzes the varied forms of paperwork produced in the process, including an extremely unusual table, and argues that the table represented an effort to produce a synoptic visualization, akin to but not identical to a map, of the location of the territory's herbs. While this table may not have ultimately succeeded as a viable paper technology, due to problems of incommensurability, it demonstrates the role of administrative practices and state actors in experimenting with information about the natural world during the early modern period
Aesthetics · Archaeology · Database · German · Natural (archaeology) · Period (music) · Process (computing) · Sociology · State (computer science) · Table (database) · Computer Science · Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis · History · History of Science and Medicine · History of Science and Natural History · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,29 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2021 (3) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |