The marginalization of astrology among Dutch astronomers in the first half of the 17th century

Bibliographic Data

ID4392380
AuthorsRienk Vermij (0000-0002-2663-4840, University of Oklahoma, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume52
Issue2
Pages153-177
Publication date2014-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHistory of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0073-2753 • E-ISSN: 1753-8564
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0073275314529862
OpenAlexW2089948429
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited3

In the first half of the 17th century, Dutch astronomers rapidly abandoned the practice of astrology. By the second half of the century, no trace of it was left in Dutch academic discourse. This abandonment, in its early stages, does not appear as the result of criticism or skepticism, although such skepticism was certainly known in the Dutch Republic and leading humanist scholars referred to Pico's arguments against astrological predictions. The astronomers, however, did not really refute astrology, but simply stopped paying attention to it, as other questions (in particular the constitution of the universe) became the focus of their scholarship. The underlying physical view of the world, with its idea of celestial influences, remained in vigor much longer. Even convinced anti-Aristotelians, in explaining the world, tried to account for the effects of the oppositions and conjunctions of planets, and similar elements. It is only with Descartes that the by now widespread skepticism about predictions found expression in a philosophy that denied celestial influence

Art · Astrology · Constitution · Epistemology · Humanism · Literature · Political science · Scholarship · Skepticism · Theology · Classics · Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies · Historical Astronomy and Related Studies · History · History and Developments in Astronomy · Law · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access