Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Slash-and-burn ecology

Field science as land use

Bibliographic Data

ID4392552
AuthorsMegan Raby (0000-0003-1702-5004, University of Texas at Austin, USA, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume57
Issue4
Pages441-468
Publication date2019-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHistory of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0073-2753 • E-ISSN: 1753-8564
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0073275318819656
PMID30661410
OpenAlexW2914218239
LanguageEN
Citations received12

Historians of science can benefit from thinking more deeply about land. Scholarly emphasis on the geographies of scientific knowledge has become pervasive since the "spatial turn" of the late 1990s. At the same time, the history of science has increasingly intersected with environmental history. Despite these growing connections, historians of science have been slow to embrace a core concern of environmental history: land. While space and place now have a rich literature in the historiography of science, land appears in histories of science in more scattered, incidental ways - largely as a place where science may occur or be applied. More than just a unit of ground, land is analytically connected to a web of questions about labor, property, governance, identity, and environmental change explored by environmental historians, geographers, and political ecologists. This article examines what historians of science - particularly, but not exclusively, historians of the field and environmental sciences - have to gain by taking land more seriously. A reexamination of the Rain Forest Project (1962-1970), a radioecology study initiated by systems ecologist Howard Thomas Odum in what is today El Yunque National Forest, Puerto Rico, serves as a case in point. Viewing this field site as land reframes ecologists' fieldwork as a form of land use, highlighting its place within regimes of land tenure, its connections with other communities' uses of the land, and its persistent local legacies

Agriculture · Archaeology · Biology · Ecosystem · Environmental ethics · Field (mathematics) · Fire ecology · Geography · Slash (logging) · Slash-and-burn · Ecology · Geographies of human-animal interactions · History · Indigenous Studies and Ecology · Philosophy

  • This Mountain Is It’

    P Marichalar•Journal of Pacific History•2021

  • Forests high on CO 2

    Open Access•Véra Ehrenstein•Environment and Planning F•2024

  • The History of Fieldwork

    Open Access•Jeremy Vetter•Histories•2022

  • Where Do, and Should, Science and Science Education Happen

    Open Access•Cyrus C M Mody•Science & Education•2026

  • Protected areas as zones of paradoxical composition. The case of an area “strictly protected for science”

    Open Access•Isabelle Arpin, Quentin Bouchu et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2025

  • Astronomy as Scientific Extractivism

    Open Access•P Marichalar•Science Technology and Society•2026

  • Quantifier la frugalité de la recherche

    Open Access•Antoine Hardy, Camille Noûs•Socio•2022

  • Invisible Labor and the “Ghost Particle”

    Open Access•Nithyanand Rao•Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschicht…•2025

  • Heritage and Environment

    Stephen Brockmann, Sophie Brockmann•Environmental History•2026

  • Decolonising spaces of knowledge production

    Open Access•Mark Griffiths, Fridah Mueni et al.•Environment and Planning E Nature…•2023

  • Climate Conscious

    Oliver Lucier•Isis•2023

  • Making Place in the Field

    Erika Lorraine Milam•Isis•2022

Unique citing works12
Citations per year2,4
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 11

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae