Is there an in-group advantage in emotion recognition

Dados Bibliográficos

ID4419635
AutoresHillary Anger Elfenbein (0000-0002-3973-1447, Harvard University), Nalini Ambady (Harvard University)
Ano2002
Volume128
Fascículo2
Páginas243-249
Data de publicação2002-01-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoPsychological Bulletin (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0033-2909 • E-ISSN: 1939-1455
EditoraAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037/0033-2909.128.2.243
PMID11931518
OpenAlexW2157282896
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas72
Referências citadas24

H. A. Elfenbein and N. Ambady (2002) examined the evidence for an in-group advantage in emotion recognition, whereby recognition is generally more accurate for perceivers from the same cultural group as emotional expressors. D. Matsumoto's (2002) comment centered on 3 asserted methodological requirements. This response addresses the lack of consensus conceming these "requirements" and demonstrates that none alter the presence of the in-group advantage. His analyses had a serious flaw and, once corrected, replicated the original findings. Furthermore, he described results from his empirical work not meeting a literal interpretation of his own requirements. Overall, where Matsumoto considers subtle cross-cultural differences in emotional expression a methodological artifact in judgment studies, the present authors find a core phenomenon worthy of attention

Artifact (error) · Cognitive psychology · Emotion recognition · Epistemology · Group (periodic table) · Interpretation (philosophy) · Linguistics · Literal (mathematical logic) · Phenomenon · Chemistry · Communication · Cultural Differences and Values · Emotion and Mood Recognition · Emotions and Moral Behavior · Mental Health Research Topics · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology