Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Clash of the paradigms

A critique of an examination of the polynomial regression technique for evaluating catastrophe theory hypotheses

Bibliographic Data

ID4422985
AuthorsStephen J Guastello (0000-0003-1059-7341, Marquette University, corresponding author)
Year1992
Volume111
Issue2
Pages375-379
Publication date1992-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychological Bulletin (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-2909 • E-ISSN: 1939-1455
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037//0033-2909.111.2.375
OpenAlexW4234695469
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited8

The polynomial regression technique for evaluating catastrophe theory hypotheses (Guastello, 1982b, 1987, 1988) has met with criticism from Alexander, Herbert, DeShon, and Hanges (1992) regarding the specification of terms in the catastrophe model and the order in which they are entered, the role of part-whole correlations, and whether the polynomial regression technique is adequate for discerning the presence or absence of catastrophic structure. Their criticisms are unwarranted and misconceived because of inattention to some fundamental principles of mathematical catastroph theory, misuse of the polynomial regression technique in their simulations, and an outmoded paradigm of scientific inquiry

Catastrophe theory · Cognitive psychology · Econometrics · Mathematical analysis · Mathematical economics · Polynomial · Polynomial regression · Regression · Regression analysis · Statistics · Applied Mathematics · Complex Systems and Decision Making · Ecosystem dynamics and resilience · Engineering · Geology · Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • A dynamic systems model of basic developmental mechanisms

    Paul Van Geert•Psychological Review•1998

  • The Last Straw

    Open Access•Lin Liu, Christy A Visher et al.•Crime & Delinquency•2026

  • A test of engagement versus disengagement in catastrophe models

    Open Access•Stuart Beattie, Marianne Davies•British Journal of Psychology•2010

  • Sudden Transitions in Attitudes

    Open Access•Han L J Van Der Maas, Rogier Kolstein et al.•Sociological Methods & Research•2003

  • Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences

    Roger E Kirk, Roger Kirk•Experimental Design•2013

  • Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences

    Jacob Cohen, Patricia Cohen et al.•Applied Multiple Regression/Correla…•2014

  • The Fractal Geometry of Nature

    Benoit B Mandelbrot, John Wheeler et al.•American Journal of Physics•1983

  • The Explanation of Social Behavior

    Suzanne Wedow, Rom Harré et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1973

  • The problem of analyzing multiplicative composites

    Martin G Evans, Martin Evans•American Psychologist•1991

  • Partialed products are interactions; partialed powers are curve components

    Jacob Cohen•Psychological Bulletin•1978

  • An examination of least-squares regression modeling of catastrophe theory

    Ralph A Alexander, Glenn R Herbert et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1992

  • Catastrophe modeling of the accident process

    Stephen J Guastello•Psychological Bulletin•1988

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,18
Citation span1998 - 2026 (29)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae