Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

How experimental methods shaped views on human competence and rationality

Dados Bibliográficos

ID4423950
AutoresTomás Lejarraga (0000-0001-6135-2243), Ralph Hertwig (0000-0002-9908-9556, Rational (Germany))
Ano2021
Volume147
Fascículo6
Páginas535-564
Data de publicação2021-06-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoPsychological Bulletin (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0033-2909 • E-ISSN: 1939-1455
EditoraAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037/bul0000324
PMID34843298
OpenAlexW3156270834
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas20

article, Tversky and Kahneman rejected this conclusion, arguing that "people rely on a limited number of heuristic principles which reduce the complex tasks of assessing probabilities and predicting values to simple judgmental operations" (p. 1124). With that, they introduced the heuristics-and-biases research program, which has profoundly altered how psychology, and the behavioral sciences more generally, view the mind's competences and rationality. How was this radical transformation possible? We examine a previously neglected driver: The heuristics-and-biases program established an experimental protocol in behavioral decision research that relied on described scenarios rather than learning and experience. We demonstrate this shift with an analysis of 604 experiments, which shows that the descriptive protocol has dominated post-1974 research. Specifically, we examine two lines of research addressed in the intuitive-statistician program (Bayesian reasoning and judgments of compound events) and two lines of research spurred by the heuristics-and-biases program (framing and anchoring and adjustment). We conclude that the focus on description at the expense of learning has profoundly shaped the influential view of the error-proneness of human cognition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)

Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Cognitive science · Competence (human resources) · Epistemology · Experimental psychology · Framing effect · Heuristic · Heuristics · Persuasion · Protocol analysis · Psychological research · Rationality · Representativeness heuristic · Statistician · Statistics · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Cognitive Aging and Decision Making in the Twilight of Mnemonic Uncertainty

    Sebastian Horn•European Psychologist•2025

  • Intellectual Humility and Humbling Environments

    Open Access•Steven Bland•Review of Philosophy and Psychology•2025

  • The Future of Decisions From Experience

    Open Access•Sebastian Olschewski, Ashley Luckman et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2024

  • People’s Responses to Nuclear Weapons

    Open Access•Astrid Kause, Helen Fischer et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2026

  • Experiencing statistical information improves children’s and adults’ inferences

    Open Access•Christin Schulze, Ralph Hertwig•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2022

  • Don’t Give-Up

    Open Access•Doron Cohen, Yael Shavit et al.•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2025

  • What’s in a sample? Epistemic uncertainty and metacognitive awareness in risk taking

    Open Access•Sebastian Olschewski, Benjamin Scheibehenne•Cognitive Psychology•2024

  • Heterogeneity of rules in Bayesian reasoning

    Open Access•Jan K Woike, Ralph Hertwig et al.•Cognitive Psychology•2023

  • Decision making under extinction risk

    Open Access•Maximilian Maier, Adam J L Harris et al.•Cognitive Psychology•2025

  • When intuitive Bayesians need to be good readers

    Open Access•Miroslav Sirota, Gorka Navarrete et al.•Cognition•2024

  • Rationality Now

    Joachim I Krueger•The American Journal of Psychology•2022

  • Rationality wars

    Open Access•Alejandro Hortal•Behavioural Public Policy•2025

  • A reply to Luc Bovens

    Open Access•Ralph Hertwig, Susan Michie et al.•Behavioural Public Policy•2025

  • Theories of Uncertainty Communication

    Open Access•Wouter Lammers, Sacha Ferrari et al.•Science Communication•2024

  • Ratio Bias Across Cultures and Disciplines

    Open Access•Jochen Baumeister, Bernhard Streicher et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2025

  • The rationality wars

    Open Access•Gerd Gigerenzer•Behavioural Public Policy•2024

  • Stereotypes as Bayesian prediction of social groups

    Open Access•Prachi Solanki, Joseph Cesario•The Journal of Social Psychology•2024

  • Skilful legal judgment and varieties of intuition

    Open Access•Tommi Ralli•Oñati Socio-legal Series•2025

  • Ecological rationality and economics

    Open Access•Andreas Ortmann, Leonidas Spiliopoulos•Synthese•2023

  • Bayesians Commit the Gambler's Fallacy

    Open Access•Kevin Dorst•Cognitive Science•2026

Obras citantes distintas20
Citações por ano5
Intervalo de citações2022 - 2026 (5)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 20
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae