The American Construction of the Poor White Problem in South Africa

Bibliographic Data

ID4437524
AuthorsZine Magubane (corresponding author)
Year2008
Volume107
Issue4
Pages691-713
Publication date2008-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSouth Atlantic Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0038-2876 • E-ISSN: 1527-8026
PublisherDuke University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1215/00382876-2008-013
OpenAlexW2006048498
LanguageEN
Citations received8

This essay examines the circuits of knowledge production that made comparisons between poor whites in the United States and South Africa pertinent and possible. It focuses on a five-volume study funded by the Carnegie Corporation of New York. The study, commissioned in the late 1920s and carried out in the early 1930s, covered all aspects of white rural poverty in South Africa. The first part of the essay discusses what made these comparisons possible by showing how American philanthropic organizations-especially the Carnegie Corporation-carved out spaces for the production and exchange of intellectuals, research paradigms, and theoretical models. The second part of the essay turns to a discussion of what made these comparisons pertinent. The defense of racial capitalism relied on gender and race discourses that put the responsibility for maintaining the prestige of the white race on white women. Reformers, social scientists, elected officials, and philanthropists believed that the so-called poor white problem was a result of the backwardness of the home, which they blamed on inept poor white mothers. Thus, the notion of poor whiteism also became deeply gendered

Backwardness · Capitalism · Corporation · Economic growth · Economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Poverty · Prestige · Race (biology) · Sociology · White (mutation) · Gender Studies · Historical Education Studies Worldwide · Law · South African History and Culture

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub