Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Spatial deixis in Ashéninka Perené (Arawak)

Semantics, Pragmatics, and Syntax of the Demonstrative Markers =ka, =ra, and =nta

Bibliographic Data

ID4442385
AuthorsElena Mihas (0000-0002-7414-8505)
Year2012
Volume12
Issue1
Pages39-65
Publication date2012-05-10
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLIAMES Línguas Indígenas Americanas (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1678-0531 • E-ISSN: 2177-7160
PublisherUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (PUBLISHER • BR)
DOI10.20396/liames.v0i12.1482
OpenAlexW2140280413
LanguageID
References cited26

The paper reports on the speaker-oriented demonstrative clitics =ka 'near speaker', =ra 'not in the speaker's interactional space', and =nta 'far from the speaker'. It is shown that in situational (deictic) use, the most relevant criteria for the three-way choice are the referent's spatial contiguity to the speaker, touching or direct contact with the referent, pointing with a hand or chin, and eye gaze. Apart from serving as markers of nominal definiteness, the bound forms are found to be used anaphorically, as well as to introduce new participants and mark 'discourse-new-but-hearer-old' information. The bound forms are also used on the syntactic levels of predication and subordination. On the predication level, =ka, =ra, =nta function either as adverbial locality clitics or modal operators, whereas in clause combining the bound forms occur as subordinating temporal or locative conjunctions

Adverbial · Contiguity · Definiteness · Deixis · Demonstrative · Linguistics · Locative case · Referent · Subordination (linguistics · Categorization, perception, and language · Computer Science · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Mathematics · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • Parts-of-speech systems

    Open Access•Paul Schachter, Timothy Shopen•Language Typology and Syntactic…•2007

  • Passive in the world's languages

    Open Access•Edward L Keenan, Matthew S Dryer•Language Typology and Syntactic…•2007

  • Space in Language and Cognition

    Open Access•C Levinson, Stephen C Levinson•Space in Language and Cognition•2003

  • Demonstratives

    Holger Diessel•Demonstratives•1999

  • The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part 2. Complex and Derived Constructions

    Simon C Dik, Kees Hengeveld•Complex and Derived Constructions•1997

  • A-Morphous Morphology

    Open Access•Stephen R Anderson•A-Morphous Morphology•1992

  • Cognitive constraints on information flow

    Wallace Chafe•Coherence and Grounding in…•1987

  • How Language Structures Space

    Open Access•Léonard Talmy•Spatial Orientation•1983

  • Demonstratives in Narrative Discourse

    Nikolaus P Himmelmann•Studies in Anaphora•1996

  • Syntax

    Open Access•Robert D Van Valin, Randy J Lapolla et al.•Syntax•1997

  • Demonstratives

    R M W Dixon•Studies in Language•2003

  • Deitic space in Wolof

    Sylvain Robert, Stéphane Robert•Space in Languages•2006

  • The Grammatical Nature and Discourse Power of Demonstratives

    Open Access•Marianne Mithun•Proceedings of the Annual Meeting…•1987

  • Semantics of the Inuktitut (Eskimo) Spatial Deictics

    J Peter Denny•International Journal of American…•1982

  • Demonstratives in Space and Interaction

    Open Access•N J Enfield•Language•2003

  • A Grammatical Sketch of Siberian Yupik Eskimo

    Bernard Comrie, Steven A Jacobson•Language•1979

  • Dependencies between Grammatical Systems

    Alexandra Y Aikhenvald, R M W Dixon•Language•1998

  • Language and Space

    C Levinson, Stephen C Levinson•Annual Review of Anthropology•1996

  • Explorations in the Deictic Field

    William F Hanks•Current Anthropology•2005

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae