The importance of re-affirming IR's disciplinary status
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4444419 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Helen Louise Turton (0000-0001-9158-0984, University of Sheffield, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 244-250 |
| Publication date | 2015-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Relations (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0047-1178 • E-ISSN: 1741-2862 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0047117815585888a |
| OpenAlex | W2337277145 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
International vs. area? The disciplinary-politics of knowledge-exchange between IR and Area Studies
What Defines a Discipline and How We Teach and Study It? The Changing Scope and Role of the Subject Benchmark Statement for Politics and International Relations (IR) and Its Implications For the Teaching and Study of Politics and IR in Higher Education
Fragmenting and connecting? The diverging geometries and extents of IR’s interdisciplinary knowledge-relations
Psychology and aggregation in International Relations
The grass isn't any greener over there
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,63 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2024 (7) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |