Methodological process ethics in international theory
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4445190 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tyler M Curley (University of Southern California, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 228-238 |
| Publication date | 2014-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Relations (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0047-1178 • E-ISSN: 1741-2862 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0047117813515008 |
| OpenAlex | W2051084072 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 8 |
In this review essay, I identify a commonality between Patrick Thaddeus Jackson's The Conduct of Inquiry and Daniel J. Levine's Recovering International Relations: an ethical methodological process to organize international theories in ways that promote a plurality of visions. Jackson's ideal-typification of the various methodological approaches in international relations encourages a pluralistic science. Likewise, Levine's constellation method demands a multiplicity of theoretical perspectives, in order to sustain the critical elements intrinsic to each. As I argue, this shared methodological process ethic not only advances theoretical pluralism but, in so doing, actively opens thinking space for constructing alternative political realities
Epistemology · Ideal (ethics) · International relations · Order (exchange) · Pluralism (philosophy) · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Vision · Anthropology · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|