Neorealism, neoclassical realism and the problem(s) of history
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4445309 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gustav Meibauer (0000-0002-5574-7270, Radboud University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 348-369 |
| Publication date | 2023-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Relations (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0047-1178 • E-ISSN: 1741-2862 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00471178211033943 |
| OpenAlex | W3184747683 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 55 |
Following scholarship on IR's 'historical turn' as well as on neorealism and neoclassical realism, this article finds fault particularly in neorealism's implicit reliance on the historically contingent but incompletely conceptualised transmission of systemic factors into state behaviour. Instead, it suggests that neoclassical realism (NCR) is well-suited to leveraging 'history' in systematic and general explanation. This article interrogates two routes towards a historically sensitive NCR (intervening variables and structural modifiers), and how they enable different operationalisations of 'history' as a sequence of events, cognitive tool or collective narrative. The first route suggests history underpins concepts and variables currently used by neoclassical realists. Here, history is more easily operationalised and allows a clearer view at learning and emulation processes. It is also more clearly scoped, and therefore less 'costly' in terms of paradigmatic distinctiveness. The second route, in which history modifies structural incentives and constraints, is more theoretically challenging especially in terms of differentiating NCR from constructivist approaches, but lends itself to theorising systemic change. Both routes provide fruitful avenues for realist theorising, can serve to emancipate NCR from neorealism in IR and foster cross-paradigmatic dialog. Examining how 'history' can be leveraged in realism allows interrogating how other 'mainstream', positivist approaches can and should leverage historical contingency, context and evidence to explain international processes and outcomes
Contingency · Economics · Epistemology · International relations · Mainstream · Narrative · Neorealism (international relations) · Political science · Positive economics · Realism · Sociology · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Philosophy
Qualitative Comparative Analysis
The Construction of Terrorist Threat in Mali
Handling the Hegemon
BRICS in Southeast Asia
Discussion of Indonesia-EU comprehensive economic partnership agreement
Neoclassical Realism, Global International Relations, and the unheard echoes of Realist practices from the South
Crossing the Rubicon’
How cyberspace affects international relations
Do Statist Ideology and State-Sponsored Nationalism Intervene in Pakistan’s China Policy? A Neoclassical Realist Perspective
When identity becomes strategy
Neoclassical realist research program for the 21st century
Analogies at War
Neoclassical realism and identity
Causes of War
Neoclassical Realist Theory of International Politics
The Logic of Anarchy
Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy
The promise of historical dynamism for the American study of international relations
The conduct of history in International Relations
Neoclassical Realist Theories, Intervening Variables, and Paradigmatic Boundaries
Forum
Bridging the Gap
Is Peaceful Change in World Politics Always Desirable? A Neoclassical Realist Perspective
Explaining why state X made a certain move last Tuesday
Realism
What is History in International Relations
A Realist View of the Eurocentric Conception of World Politics
Reading History through Constructivist Eyes
International Relations and the `Problem of History
Ideas and alternatives in American grand strategy, 2000–2004
The realism that did not speak its name
Interests, ideas, and the study of state behaviour in neoclassical realism
Systemic pressures and domestic ideas
History, theory and the narrative turn in IR
Is Anybody Still a Realist
On Systemic Paradigms and Domestic Politics
Historical Reality vs. Neo-Realist Theory
Pragmatic eclecticism, neoclassical realism and post-structuralism
The Peace of Illusions
Realist Constructivism
Realist Environment, Liberal Process, and Domestic-Level Variables
Assessing the historical turn in IR
Theory of international politics
Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy
The Economic Sins of Modern IR Theory and the Classical Realist Alternative
The Unrealism of Contemporary Realism
Why Ideas Matter in International Relations
Kenneth Waltz is not a neorealist (and why that matters)
The Enduring Dilemmas of Realism in International Relations
Leaving theory behind
Reconceptualizing Anarchy
Paradigm Lost? Reassessing Theory of International Politics
The eternal divide? History and International Relations
State Building for Future Wars
Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity
Why is there no non-Western international relations theory? An introduction
Putting the 'Classical' in Neoclassical Realism
Historicism
Why is there no International Theory
Gilpinian Realism and International Relations
US grand strategy after the Cold War
Recollecting a lost dialogue
Evaluating Theories
The Realist Paradigm and Degenerative versus Progressive Research Programs
The Narrative Organization of Collective Memory
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,75 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |