Realism and great power subversion
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 4445323 |
|---|---|
| Autores | William C Wohlforth (Dartmouth College, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2020 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 459-481 |
| Data de publicação | 2020-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | International Relations (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0047-1178 • E-ISSN: 1741-2862 |
| Editora | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0047117820968858 |
| OpenAlex | W3097114539 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 16 |
I present a realist theory of subversion among great powers, an understudied phenomenon in the burgeoning literature on subversive statecraft. I show that a simple, rational cost-benefit calculus accounts for comparatively low-levels of subversion among non-belligerent great powers, much higher levels among belligerent great powers, and more frequent, violent and larger-scale subversion against weaker targets. Brief case studies of mid-twentieth century subversion featuring the Soviet Union and the United States illustrate the theory and provide preliminary support. Theory and evidence show that the conditions that are conducive to highly consequential subversion among great powers are quite limited and reversible. This gives rise to skepticism concerning claims that today's strategic environment has fundamentally transformed the nature of great power rivalry so as to accord a newly central place to subversion
Belligerent · Epistemology · Law and economics · Phenomenon · Physics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics) · Realism · Sociology · Subversion · Economic Sanctions and International Relations · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Philosophy · Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
Kommersiell sporing – nasjonal risiko
Tip-toeing through the Tulips with Congress
Creating Status Loss
The Subversion Aversion Paradox
Public opinion and international organizations
The Interference Narrative in Australia - China Relations
Why do states choose covert action
State preferences, viable alternatives, and American covert action, 1946-1989
Artificial intelligence and international security
Levels of division
Introducing Peig 2.0
Divided we stand? Examining the European Union’s ability to withstand external wedging
Challenges of Interference and Disinformation in Italy
A new and better quiet option? Strategies of subversion and cyber conflict
Subversion, cyber operations, and reverse structural power in world politics
Resisting disinformation
| Obras citantes distintas | 16 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 4 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 15 |