Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How Political Cultures Produce Different Antibiotic Policies in Agriculture

A Historical Comparative Case Study between the United Kingdom and Sweden

Bibliographic Data

ID4445929
AuthorsStephanie Begemann (NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections Institute of Infection and Global Health University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom, corresponding author), Elizabeth Perkins (0000-0002-0213-8105, Health Services Research Institute of Psychology Health and Society, University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom, corresponding author), Ine Van Hoyweghen (0000-0002-9402-2918, Life Sciences & Society Lab Centre of Sociological Research (CeSO), KU Leuven Leuven Belgium, corresponding author), Robert Christley (0000-0001-9250-3032, Epidemiology and Population Health NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections Institute of Infection and Global Health University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom, corresponding author), Francine Watkins (School of Medicine Institute of Psychology Health and Society, University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume58
Issue4
Pages765-785
Publication date2018-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociologia Ruralis (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0038-0199 • E-ISSN: 1467-9523
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/soru.12206
PMID30449903
OpenAlexW2885949342
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited48

The purpose of this article is to provide an understanding of how different countries formulate and regulate antibiotic use in animals raised for human consumption. A comparative case study was undertaken, analysing historical documents from the 1950s to the 1990s from the UK, the first country to produce a scientific report on the public health risks of agricultural antibiotic use; and Sweden, the first country to produce legislation on the growth promotor use of antibiotics in food animals. Sheila Jasanoff's concepts of 'co-production' and 'political cultures' have been used to explore how both countries used different styles of scientific reasoning and justification of the risks of agricultural antibiotic use. It will be argued that national dynamics between policy, science and public knowledges co-produced different risk classifications and patterns of agricultural antibiotic use between both countries. UK's political culture used 'expert committees' to remove the issue from public debate and to inform agricultural antibiotic policies. In contrast, the Swedish 'consensus-oriented' political culture made concerns related to agricultural antibiotic use into a cooperative debate that included multiple discourses. Understanding how national policies, science and public knowledges interact with the risks related to agricultural antibiotic use can provide valuable insights in understanding and addressing countries agricultural use of antibiotics

Agricultural policy · Agricultural productivity · Agriculture · Biology · Economic growth · Economics · Legislation · Political science · Politics · Public health · Ecology · Law · Medicine · Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

  • Antibiotics in pig meat production

    Open Access•Alexandra Waluszewski, Alessandro Cinti et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2021

  • National action on antimicrobial resistance and the political economy of health care

    Open Access•Mirko Heinzel, Mathias Koenig-Archibugi•Journal of European Public Policy•2024

  • The Role of US Policymaking in the Emergence of a Digital Health Assemblage

    Elisa Lievevrouw, Luisa Marelli et al.•Science as Culture•2022

  • The challenges of implementing antibiotic stewardship in diverse poultry value chains in Kenya

    Open Access•Alex Hughes, Emma J Roe et al.•Agriculture and Human Values•2023

  • Change it or perish? Drug resistance and the dynamics of livestock farm practices

    Open Access•Camille Bellet•Journal of Rural Studies•2018

  • Antibiotic stewardship and its implications for agricultural animal-human relationships

    Open Access•Richard Helliwell, Carol Morris et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2020

  • Who pays for the cost of change? On the different antibiotic use patterns in three Nordic pig-meat settings

    Open Access•Alexandra Waluszewski, Debbie Harrison et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2026

  • Environmental imaginaries and the environmental sciences of antimicrobial resistance

    Open Access•Richard Helliwell, Sujatha Raman et al.•Environment and Planning E Nature…•2021

  • Assembling antimicrobial resistance governance in UK animal agriculture

    Open Access•Richard Helliwell, Carol Morris et al.•Sociologia Ruralis•2022

  • Designs on Nature

    Sheila Jasanoff•Designs on Nature•2005

  • Keep it complex

    Open Access•Andy Stirling•Nature•2010

  • Civilization and madness

    Open Access•Sheila Jasanoff•Public Understanding of Science•1997

  • States of Knowledge

    Sheila Jasanoff•States of Knowledge•2004

  • Swedish agriculture during the twentieth century in relation to sustainability

    Open Access•Basim Saifi, Lars Drake•Ecological Economics•2008

  • On Politics and the Little Tools of Democracy

    Kristin Asdal•Distinktion Journal of Social…•2008

  • State-centered versus Nonstate-driven Organic Food Standardization

    Open Access•Magnus Boström, Mikael Klintman•Agriculture and Human Values•2006

  • Framing the agricultural use of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in UK national newspapers and the farming press

    Open Access•Carol Morris, Richard Helliwell et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2016

  • The Issues Deserve More Credit

    Open Access•N Marres•Social Studies of Science•2007

  • The Politics of Talk

    Open Access•Alec Irwin•Social Studies of Science•2006

  • Recuperating from BSE

    Open Access•Corinne Wales, Mark Harvey et al.•Appetite•2006

  • Resisting and accepting

    M Tironi, Maite P Salazar et al.•Technology in Society•2013

  • The Politics of the Consumer

    Open Access•Leonard Tivey•The Political Quarterly•1968

  • The local universality of veterinary expertise and the geography of animal disease

    Open Access•Gareth Enticott•Transactions of the Institute of…•2011

  • Modernized Farming but Stagnated Production

    Martiin Martiin•Agricultural History•2015

  • From cruelty to welfare

    Open Access•Abigail Wood, Abigail Woods•Endeavour•2011

  • Acting in an uncertain world

    Michel Callon, Pierre Lascoumes et al.•Acting in an uncertain world•2009

  • From State Direction to Self Regulation

    Graham Cox, Philip Lowe et al.•Policy & Politics•1986

  • Governmentality and territoriality

    Open Access•Jonathan Murdoch, Nkil Ward•Political Geography•1997

  • Introduction

    Open Access•Kristin Asdal, Christoph Gradmann•Science in Context•2014

  • Technology identity

    Open Access•Ulucanlar, S Ulucanlar et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2013

  • Actor-Networks, Farmer Decisions, and Identity

    Open Access•Benjamin J Gray, Benjamin Gray et al.•Culture Agriculture Food and…•2013

Unique citing works9
Citations per year1,13
Citation span2018 - 2026 (9)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae