Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Conclusions

What future for the Treaty of Lisbon

Datos Bibliográficos

ID4447339
AutoresAriadna Ripoll, Ariadna Ripoll Servent (0000-0002-1399-6535, University of Salzburg, autor de correspondencia)
Año2021
Volumen58
Número1
Páginase72661
Fecha de publicación2021-05-07
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPolítica y Sociedad (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1130-8001 • E-ISSN: 1988-3129
EditorialUniversidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5209/poso.72661
OpenAlexW3160479715
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas30

This conclusion to the special issue reflects on the evolution of European integration since the early 1990s in order to better understand the contested origins of the Treaty of Lisbon and the consequences the latter have had for the EU's political system. It considers the various contributions of the special issue and shows how the Treaty emerged in an era of shifting cleavages, disputed steps towards a more political Union and rising populism. This legacy has led to more polarisation and politicisation - a phenomenon that the Treaty of Lisbon struggles to encapsulate and conciliate with the culture of consensus and compromise inherent to its institutional structures. As a result, we observe a bias towards policy stability - and even failure - that affects the legitimacy and democratic standards of the European Union. In a context of polycrisis, the difficulty to find compromises - especially in highly normative issues - leads to the de-politicisation of the EU and reinforces the gap between EU institutions and its citizens. The COVID-19 pandemic is a window of opportunity for the EU, in which to choose between integration and disintegration; between values and inaction

Compromise · Context (archaeology · Democracy · Democratic legitimacy · Economics · European integration · European union · Geography · International trade · Law and economics · Legitimacy · Maastricht Treaty · Normative · Order (exchange · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Populism · Sociology · Treaty · Treaty of Lisbon · European Union Policy and Governance · Law · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Social Policy and Reform Studies

  • Elecciones al Parlamento Europeo y programas de los partidos nacionales

    Open Access•Cristina Ares Castro-Conde, Alicia Mangana Ríos•Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto•2022

  • Politicising Europe

    Open Access•Swen Hutter, Edgar Grande et al.•Politicising Europe•2016

  • The New Intergovernmentalism

    Christopher J Bickerton, Dermot Hodson et al.•New Intergovernmentalism•2015

  • Accountability, Dependency, and EU Agencies

    Open Access•Satoko Horii•Refugee Survey Quarterly•2018

  • Framing immobility

    Sarah Wolff, Ariadna Ripoll Servent et al.•Journal of European Integration•2020

  • The Joint‐decision Trap

    Open Access•Fritz W Scharpf•Public Administration•1988

  • A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration

    Open Access•Liesbet Hooghe, Gary Marks•British Journal of Political…•2008

  • Three decades of populist radical right parties in Western Europe

    Open Access•Cas Mudde•European Journal of Political…•2012

  • What is intergovernmental about the EU’s ‘(new) intergovernmentalist’ turn? Evidence from the Eurozone and asylum crises

    Open Access•Sandrino Smeet, Natascha Zaun•West European Politics•2020

  • To Scrutinise or Not to Scrutinise? Explaining Variation in EU-Related Activities in National Parliaments

    Katrin Auel, Olivier Rozenberg et al.•West European Politics•2015

  • The populist politics of Euroscepticism in times of crisis

    Open Access•Andrea L P Pirro, Andrea LP Pirro et al.•Politics•2018

  • Engaging the disengaged? Explaining the participation of Eurosceptic MEPs in trilogue negotiations

    Open Access•Ariadna Ripoll Servent, Lara Panning•Journal of European Public Policy•2021

  • Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises

    Liesbet Hooghe, Gary Marks•Journal of European Public Policy•2018

  • Introduction

    Jonathan Zeitlin, Francesco Nicoli et al.•Journal of European Public Policy•2019

  • More integration, less federation

    Philipp Genschel, Markus Jachtenfuchs•Journal of European Public Policy•2016

  • A Matter of Supply and Demand

    Open Access•Stijn Van Kessel•Government and Opposition•2013

  • Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration

    Open Access•Liesbet Hooghe, Gary Marks et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2002

  • EU Actors under pressure

    Edoardo Bressanelli, Christel Koop et al.•Journal of European Public Policy•2020

  • Understanding varieties of populism in times of crises

    Manuela Caiani, Paolo Graziano•West European Politics•2019

  • Drifting Further Apart

    Mikko Mattila, Tapio Raunio•West European Politics•2012

  • States as Gatekeepers in EU Asylum Politics

    Open Access•Natascha Zaun•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2018

  • A New Form of Delegation in EU Asylum

    Open Access•Ariadna Ripoll Servent•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2018

  • The Communitarization of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice

    Open Access•Florian Trauner, Ariadna Ripoll Servent•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2016

  • Concluding Early Agreements in the EU

    Open Access•Tom Delreux, Thomas Laloux•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2018

  • What unites the voter bases of populist parties? Comparing the electorates of 15 populist parties

    Open Access•Matthijs Rooduijn•European Political Science Review•2018

Obras citantes distintas1
Citas por año0,25
Intervalo de citas2022 - 2022 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae