Orientalismo em um só País? Raça, Região e Nação no Brasil do Século XX

This article considers the different approaches to the problem of regional inequalities within nations in Latin America, and specifically in Brazil. Beginning in the 1960s, scholars used "internal colonialism" to analyze these inequalities, but this concept fell out of fashion in the 1980s with the post-structuralist/cultural turn. Yet dramatic regional inequalities continued to be a feature of Latin American societies. This article suggests adapting Edward Said's concept of "orientalism" to the processes by which difference gets produced to naturalize regional inequalities, and then explores the way this "internal orientalism" emerged in the increasingly dominant region of So Paulo, especially vis vis the "Norte" or "Nordeste." In particular, it looks at the 1932 regionalist movement known as the Revoluo Constitucionalista, in which the insurgent state government of So Paulo took up arms against the federal government, and declared its unwillingness to be subordinated to the authority of politicians from "inferior" regions. This period of intense paulista chauvinism allows us to see the way in which regional difference became racialized, and how So Paulo's claims to modernity became associated with whiteness. At the same time, So Paulo's location within the same nation as its regional opponents limited the degree to which it could maintain political and cultural hegemony, even as it remained Brazil's economic "locomotiva.

Art · Chauvinism · Geography · Government (linguistics) · Hegemony · Humanities · Inequality · Latin Americans · Modernity · Orientalism · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · State (computer science) · Brazilian History and Foreign Policy · Gender Studies · International Relations in Latin America · Law · Philosophy · Race, Identity, and Education in Brazil