William Whewell and John Stuart Mill
Their Controversy about Scientific Knowledge
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4455452 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Edward W Strong (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1955 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 209 |
| Publication date | 1955-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of the History of Ideas (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-5037 • E-ISSN: 1086-3222 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2707663 |
| OpenAlex | W2322805430 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
Archaeology · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Mill · Philosophy of science · Classics · History · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science
Paul Leuckfeld (1859–1930) and the Inductive Philosophy of William Whewell (1794–1866)
La tentation comtienne de John Stuart Mill
Victorian Piety Practiced
From Men of Letters to Intellectuals
Rethinking Whewell
The Whewell-Mill debate on predictions, from Mill's point of view
William Whewell and John Stuart Mill on the methodology of political economy
Unwarranted assumptions
Darwin's debt to philosophy
Colligation in modelling practices
Theories of Scientific Method from Plato to Mach
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,19 |
| Citation span | 1968 - 2023 (56) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |