The Idea of Teleology
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4456902 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ernst Mayr (0000-0001-8402-5990, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1992 |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 117 |
| Publication date | 1992-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of the History of Ideas (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-5037 • E-ISSN: 1086-3222 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2709913 |
| OpenAlex | W2323151943 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 38 |
Perhaps no other ideology has influenced biology more profoundly than teleological thinking. In one form or another it was the prevailing world view prior to Darwin. (Indeed it is one of the relatively few world views seriously considered by western man.) Appropriately, the discussion of teleology occupies considerable space (10-14%) in several recent philosophies of biology.' Such a finalistic world view had many roots. It is reflected by the millenarian beliefs of many Christians, by the enthusiasm for progress promoted by the Enlightenment, by transformationist evolutionism, and by everybody's hope for a better future. However, such a finalistic world view was only one of several widely adopted Weltanschauungen. Grossly simplifying a far more complex picture, one can perhaps distinguish, in the period prior to Darwin, three ways of looking at the world: 1. A recently created and constant world. This was the orthodox Christian dogma, which, however, by 1859 had largely lost its credibility, at least among philosophers and scientists.2 2. An eternal and either constant or cycling world, exhibiting no constant direction or goal. Everything in such a world, as asserted by Democritus and his followers, is due to chance or necessity, with chance by far the more important factor. There is no room for teleology in this world view, everything being due to chance or causal mechanisms. It allows for change, but such change is not directional; it is not an evolution. This view gained some support during the Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment, but remained very much a minority view until the nineteenth century. A rather pronounced polarization developed from the seventeenth to the nineteenth centuries, between the strict mechanists
Epistemology · Teleology · Evolution and Science Education · Philosophy
Sense and Supersensibility
Embryological Models in Ancient Philosophy
Is Poincaréan nonlinear dynamics the alternative to the selection theory of evolution
To What Inanimate Matter Are We Most Closely Related and Does the Origin of Life Harbor Meaning
On the Naturalized Explanations of the Teleology of Ecosystem Development from the Framework of Thermodynamics
Equilibrium as compatibility of plans
What is narrativity
Positive action paradox in UK police recruitment
Four Theories of Things
Urban Success and Urban Adaptation Over the Long Run
Kant, Linnaeus, and the economy of nature
How was teleology eliminated in early molecular biology
Scientific Method, Complexity and Phenomenology in Human Knowledge
Hawks, Doves, and Perissodus microlepis. Undermining the selected effects theory of function
Philosophy of nature and organism’s autonomy
How Metaphors Guide, Teach and Popularize Science
Some Remarks on a Relational Concept of Mind
The Social Evolution of Human Nature
Law, Teleology and International Relations
Haosul hazardului sau cosmosul determinismului
The chaos of hazard or the cosmos of determinism
Philip Sidney and Edmund Spenser on Transnational Governance and the Future of Christendom
Agency
Functional analysis and the species design
Aristotelian essentialism
Nested explanation in Aristotle and Mayr
An externalist teleology
Minimal logical teleology in artifacts and biology connects the two domains and frames mechanisms via epistemic circularity
Phenomenology as a Foundation of Economic Method
Reasons for the Failure of Theories
Is Gaia alive? The future of a symbiotic planet
Organizations, Naturalism, and Complexity
Towards an Ecology of Time
Rational Choice vs. Program-based Behavior
Teoria do valor
Strong and Weak Teleology in the Life Sciences Post-Darwin
On the debate about teleology in biology
In defense of endogenous, spontaneously ordered development
| Unique citing works | 38 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,15 |
| Citation span | 1993 - 2026 (34) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 36 |