The Anthropocene's animal? Coywolves as feral cotravelers

Bibliographic Data

ID4464685
AuthorsScott Rutherford (0000-0002-0322-3424)
Year2018
Volume1
Issue1-2
Pages206-223
Publication date2018-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironment and Planning E Nature and Space (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2514-8486 • E-ISSN: 2514-8494
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/2514848618763250
OpenAlexW2793917213
LanguageEN
Citations received38
References cited47

This article considers the irreducible indeterminacy of the coywolf and how this shapes human perceptions of the animal, as well as attempts to manage it. The hybridity of the coywolf matters very much to its interactions with humans, as well as the panic that has ensued over its evolutionary success. They are genetic and morphological intermediaries, an admixture of western coyote, eastern wolf, and dog. They hunt in packs like wolves but demonstrate a fearlessness to humans more common of coyotes. They thrive in urban or semiurban environs, moving along our highway, transit, and green space systems in search of food and shelter. I suggest it is the putative ferality of the coywolf-its margin-dwelling between urban and wild, between wolf and coyote-that disrupts our prevailing narratives about how, and on whose terms, animals can occupy the world. But it is also an animal that offers an opening to think about mutual flourishing. I contend this is a fruitful place to start tackling the questions raised by the Anthropocene, and reimagining all creatures as cotravelers

Aesthetics · Animal ethics · Anthropocene · Archaeology · Art · Biology · Cityscape · Creatures · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Ethnology · Flourishing · Geography · Indeterminacy (philosophy · Narrative · Natural (archaeology · Sociology · Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Human-Animal Interaction Studies · Psychology · Ecology · History · Philosophy · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub