Biocultural nation making

Biopolitics, cultural-territorial belonging, and national protected areas

Bibliographic Data

ID4464811
AuthorsJames Stinson (0000-0001-6894-0291, York University, corresponding author), Elizabeth Lunstrum (0000-0003-0097-4596, Boise State University)
Year2022
Volume5
Issue2
Pages566-587
Publication date2022-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironment and Planning E Nature and Space (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2514-8486 • E-ISSN: 2514-8494
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/2514848621995189
OpenAlexW3134292454
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited67

While the academic literature on biopolitics has investigated how the life of the population and its biological capacities have increasingly become the target of political concern and intervention largely at the scale of the nation, the literature on nations and nationalism has explored nations as cultural-territorial units including questions of their emergence, ongoing production, and impacts. What these share is a similar if not nearly identical object of analysis: the nation or national population. These, however, are realms of scholarly debate that have largely, and quite surprisingly, bypassed one another. This paper advances the concept of biocultural nation making to bridge these debates and illustrate that nation making is at once biological and cultural-territorial and that these are deeply intertwined. We ground this in the experience of Canadian national parks, highlighting how "natural" environments like national parks are key sites of biocultural, and increasingly neoliberal, national production. Here, state conservation organizations promote park visitation as a means of, first, enabling an active, healthy, and economically productive national population. Second, parks are promoted on the grounds that they enable the experience of distinctively Canadian landscapes and places of national inclusion especially as park visitorship is expanded to include nontraditional visitors including immigrants, urban communities, and the youth. Parks, in short, have become vehicles of biocultural, and increasingly neoliberal, nation making. While there are indeed affirmative aspects to this, we also highlight hidden exclusions tied to the embrace of neoliberal logic, the limits of multiculturalism, and the ongoing erasure of Indigenous communities

Biopower · Economic growth · Environmental ethics · Geography · Indigenous · Multiculturalism · National park · Nationalism · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Population · Sociology · Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond · Environmental Philosophy and Ethics · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Law · Ecology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access