Time for rewilding

The chronobiopolitics of wildlife conservation in Britain

Bibliographic Data

ID4464820
AuthorsFilipa Soares (0000-0002-4678-1995, University of Oxford), Jamie Lorimer (0000-0003-4369-0884, Leverhulme Trust)
Year2025
Volume8
Issue6
Pages1973-2001
Publication date2025-09-11
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironment and Planning E Nature and Space (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2514-8486 • E-ISSN: 2514-8494
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/25148486251375005
OpenAlexW4414120617
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited111

Rewilding is a new approach to wildlife conservation that challenges the temporalities of orthodox approaches to identifying and securing desired environments. It encourages conservationists to look to deeper pasts and further futures as they formulate appropriate reference points for the Anthropocene. It figures conservation less as the prevention of species extinction and more as the choreography of ecological processes to secure desired functions and services. This paper focuses on Britain and the use of large herbivores and native trees to enable afforestation. It develops and applies a novel conceptual framework for critically examining the temporalities of rewilding by drawing together cognate literatures from political ecology, environmental philosophy, time studies, queer theory and disability studies to help theorise the chrononormativities and chronobiopolitics of rewilding. The analysis comes in three parts. The first examines the normative political strategies of baselining and horizoning through which pasts and futures are mobilised to legitimate present rewilding practice. The second explores the environmental biopolitics through which temporal rhythms are choreographed in the practices of rewilding, exploring how processes of ecological succession are curated and how rewilders deal with unexpected events. The final part of the analysis critiques the emerging chrononormativities and chronobiopolitics of rewilding in Britain and advocates for alternative models more conducive to multispecies flourishing in the queer, crip ecologies of modern Britain. The conclusion identifies priorities for future research on time in conservation and calls for continued conceptual engagement at the interface of political ecology and queer and disability theories

Environmental Philosophy and Ethics · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Urban Green Space and Health

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access