Contested land grabbing in Belgium
Port expansion, nature compensation, and the impact on farming in the Antwerp Left Bank
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4464840 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Helene Schmutzler (0009-0004-5199-8242, KU Leuven, corresponding author), Xenia Katsigianni (0000-0002-3521-3546, KU Leuven), Pieter Van Den Broeck (0000-0002-3388-0759, KU Leuven) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 909-933 |
| Publication date | 2025-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environment and Planning E Nature and Space (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2514-8486 • E-ISSN: 2514-8494 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/25148486251325038 |
| OpenAlex | W4408391281 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 60 |
To unravel the nuances of the concept and process of land and green grabbing and shed more light on Western European cases, this article focuses on the planning process for expanding the Antwerp port on the Left Bank of the river Scheldt and nature compensation in the adjacent agricultural area. The research mobilizes the strategic-relational institutionalist approach enhanced with the framework of ecological and economic crisis moments seeing planning instruments as politicized social processes embedded in social discourses and institutional changes. It draws on semi-structured interviews and document analysis to address the question: To what extent do actors and institutions involved in nature compensations in the Left Bank enable double land grabbing? In the planning process for the port's expansion, running from 1997 to 2022, the authors identify four dominant institutional fields, three significant crisis moments, and six relevant social groups and the mobilized discourses that played a role in either enabling or obstructing the grabbing process. This influenced the rise of crisis moments, marked by three major judicial cases involving the Council of State, which structured the shifts from one institutional field to the other. As four planning episodes on nature compensations unfolded, including several spatial plans, a complex process, and a negotiation phase, these institutional fields ultimately enabled a double land grab, combining land appropriation for both spatial development and environmental purposes, by giving primacy to pro-compensation discourses and allies. Overall, this study shows the importance of understanding 'grabbing' as a nuanced, transformative, and gradually institutionalizing social process
Agriculture · Archaeology · Business · Economic geography · Economics · Economy · Geography · Land grabbing · Political science · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development · Engineering · Land Rights and Reforms
The Socio-politics of the urbanization - transportation nexus
The Social Construction of Planning Systems
The politics of biodiversity offsetting across time and institutional scales
Bureaucratic land grabbing for infrastructural colonization
Spreading ‘green’ infrastructural harm
Land Grabbing and Global Governance
On the Project of 'Institutional Transformation' in the Planning Field
Crisis and land dispossession in Greece as part of the global ‘land fever’
From Rhetoric to Practice
Towards a science of ‘land grabbing’
Grey areas in green grabbing
Linking actors and scales by green grabbing in Bozbük and Kazıklı
Land grabbing in the Brazilian Amazon
Farmers’ preferences for nature conservation compensation measures with a focus on eco-accounts according to the German Nature Conservation Act
Forest plantations and climate change discourses
Revealing the hidden effects of land grabbing through better understanding of farmers’ strategies in dealing with land loss
Land dispossessions and water appropriations
Land grabbing within a protected area
Periurbanization as the institutionalization of place
Land concentration and land grabbing in Europe
Global Land Grabbing and Political Reactions ‘From Below’
No Net Loss
Neoliberal Capitalism and Conservation in the Post‐crisis Era
A Sociological Institutionalist Approach to the Study of Innovation in Governance Capacity
Land in urban debates
NatureTM Inc
Substitution and scalar politics
Addressing the impacts of large-scale land investments
Introduction to themed issue
From land grabs to inclusive development
Resistance or adaptation? Ukrainian peasants’ responses to large-scale land acquisitions
Accumulation by Conservation
Rethinking Enclosure
The Politics of Transnational Agrarian Movements
Internal Colonisation and Indigenous Resource Sovereignty
Wind parks in post-crisis Greece
Building Institutional Capacity through Collaborative Approaches to Urban Planning
Institutional Re(turns) and the Strategic - Relational Approach
Primitive Accumulation, New Enclosures, and Global Land Grabs
Global Land Grabbing and Trajectories of Agrarian Change
Green Grabbing
Enclosing the global commons
The potential perils of forest carbon contracts for developing countries
Territorialization, enclosure and neoliberalism
New frontiers of land control
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |