Mosaics of nature, meaning, and politics
Conservation of coastal heathlands in Western Norway
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4464859 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Frode Sundnes (0000-0003-2338-3529, Norwegian Institute for Water Research, corresponding author), Kathrine I Johnsen (0000-0001-9459-5890, Norwegian Institute for Water Research), Bente Sundsvold (0000-0001-5059-7288, Centre for Arctic Gas Hydrate, Environment and Climate) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 1290-1308 |
| Publication date | 2025-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environment and Planning E Nature and Space (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2514-8486 • E-ISSN: 2514-8494 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/25148486251342987 |
| OpenAlex | W4410841594 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 23 |
In this paper, we seek to understand the practices that shape nature into governable objects by exploring the different framings of coastal heathlands and the political technologies that inform their governance. Through investigating national policy objectives alongside related management practices - and drawing on a case study from western Norway - we explore how conflicting values and aims may emerge in the governance and stewardship of these landscapes. Coastal heathlands are designated as a selected habitat type in Norwegian policies and are, therefore, subject to special consideration in land use decisions. There appears to be a joint understanding locally, regionally, and nationally that these habitats are best conserved through the prevention of reforestation and the maintenance of openness via grazing and burning. However, there is less coherence regarding how heathlands are defined and which areas qualify as such. The scientific and administrative propensity to categorise nature masks the mosaic of habitats that make up the landscapes and the local meanings attached to them. This contrasts with local land users' alternative makings of the landscape, rooted in traditional practices. Furthermore, we find that policies of nature conservation and agriculture offer competing incentives for stimulating or disciplining farming practices. This jeopardises the voluntary engagement by landowners and farmers, which is crucial to sustaining these landscapes and their diverse values. The political technologies used to define and make sense of nature form the coastal heathlands as an object of governance. We show, however, that the tools and the knowledge systems used by authorities to define and justify conservation needs may, paradoxically, hinder more integrated approaches to conservation
Agriculture · Business · Corporate governance · Economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Political science · Politics · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Land Use and Ecosystem Services
The Will to Improve
The Subject and Power
Powers of Freedom
States of Knowledge
Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology
On Politics and the Little Tools of Democracy
The practice of landscape ‘Conventions’ and the just landscape
Usages of the “cultural landscape” concept in Norwegian and Nordic landscape administration
Foucault in the Landscape
Globalization as Governmentality
Enacting things through numbers
Recovering the Substantive Nature of Landscape
Anthropological Engagements with Development
The limits of 'neoliberal natures
Seeing Like a State
The Perception of the Environment
Colonial Governmentality
Beyond "the State" and Failed Schemes
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |