Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

On Kant doing philosophy and the Peircean alternative

Bibliographic Data

ID4473442
AuthorsDan Nesher (University of Haifa , Haifa , Israel, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume2023
Issue251
Pages1-38
Publication date2023-05-25
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSemiotica (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0037-1998 • E-ISSN: 1613-3692
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/sem-2022-0022
OpenAlexW4361283940
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited14

In my work on Kant's Transcendental epistemology, I criticize his three Critiques and show that none of them can solve the problems that Kant endeavored to solve; and he even, in a way, admitted it. In the first Critique, Kant attempts to solve the difficulties of the Cartesian Idealism and Humean Empirism, in combining them mechanically in his own Transcendental formalism and Sensual matter without being able to bridge the gap between them. In the second Critique, Kant endeavored to make his Practical Reason of the a priori pure fact of formal morality into free moral conduct to materialize his ideal commonwealth of ends, but he could not bridge this gap. In his third Critique, Kant attempted to make the aesthetic reflective judgment of beauty objective, including of artworks, but failed to do so. The Peircean pragmaticist method can save the theory of knowledge both from the dogmatism of the metaphysical realists and from the inconsistency of the phenomenalists and holists. Peirce developed his epistemological realism in response to the difficulties of Kant's transcendental epistemology, especially that of his three Critiques. It seems that in his late research Kant tries to follow Spinoza in the distinction between the causality in nature and the human inner causality as one's Moral freedom and yet for Kant they operate in different domains to keep human freedom absolute, while the Spinozist conception of human freedom is in Nature and relative to human knowledge of reality and one's relative power in Nature. Kant'sAnthropology from a Pragmatic Point of Viewis a continuation of his Transcendental critical philosophy, but also his intended empirical epistemology by which to develop a practical deviation from his Copernican Revolution in the direction of the Peircean contra-revolution in Pragmaticist epistemology

Epistemology · Idealism · Metaphysics · Morality · Practical reason · Realism · Transcendental idealism · Transcendental number · Transcendental philosophy · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Historical Philosophy and Science · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy

  • La sémiotique qui étonne toujours

    Open Access•Ekaterina Velmezova, Richard Rosenbaum•Semiotica•2024

  • Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art, Vol. 1

    Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Sir Thomas Malcolm Knox et al.•Aesthetics•1975

  • Immanuel Kant: Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals

    Open Access•Immanuel Kant, Mary Gregor et al.•Immanuel Kant : Groundwork of the…•2011

  • The Cambridge Companion to Hume

    Open Access•John Biro, Alexander Rosenberg et al.•The Cambridge companion to Hume•1993

  • Morality and Freedom

    Henry E Allison•The Philosophical Review•1986

  • III. Kantian intuitions

    Jaakko Hintikka•Inquiry•1972

  • Kant's System of Nature and Freedom

    Paul Guyer•Kant's System of Nature and Freedom•2005

  • Epistemic logic

    Open Access•Dan Nesher•Semiotica•2021

  • "What makes a reasoning sound" is the proof of its truth

    Open Access•Dan Nesher•Semiotica•2018

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae