Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Understanding and handling unreliable narratives

A pragmatic model and method

Bibliographic Data

ID4474056
AuthorsTheresa Heyd (0000-0001-5940-4569, corresponding author)
Year2006
Volume2006
Issue162
Publication date2006-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSemiotica (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0037-1998 • E-ISSN: 1613-3692
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/sem.2006.078
OpenAlexW2072492535
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited6

This paper explores the pragmatic foundations of unreliable narration (UN), a narrative technique highly popular in western literary texts. It sets out by giving a critique of the competing theoretic frameworks of UN, namely the seminal Boothian concept and more recent constructivist approaches. It is argued that both frameworks neglect a pragmatic perspective as the most viable way for identifying and analysing UN. Such a pragmatic model is then developed on the basis of theories of cooperation, such as the Gricean maxims, relevance theory, and politeness. The emerging definition of UN treats a narrator as unreliable if he or she violates the cooperative principle without intending an implicature. This model is tested against three prototypical UNs: Christie's The Murder of Roger Ackroyd , Ishiguro's The Remains of the Day , and Poe's The Tell-Tale Heart . These sample analyses yield a typology of UN: while pragmatic deviation is shown to be the intrinsic feature of the phenomenon, unreliable narrators vary according to their degree of intentionality. Finally, two recurring issues in the UN debate are briefly discussed: the existence of textual clues of UN, and the role of the reader in constructing unreliability

Cognition · Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy) · Epistemology · Implicature · Linguistics · Narrative · Neglect · Perspective (graphical) · Phenomenon · Politeness · Pragmatics · Relevance (law) · Relevance theory · Sociology · Typology · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Mathematics · Narrative Theory and Analysis · Philosophy · Psychology

  • Narrative Kill or Capture

    Open Access•Matthew Windsor•Leiden Journal of International Law•2015

  • Narrative cues to implicatures in classic novels

    Open Access•Attila L Nemesi•Journal of Pragmatics•2025

  • Impossible Worlds

    Open Access•Francesco Berto, Mark Jago•Impossible Worlds•2019

  • Cross-Fictional Quantification in the Artifactual Theory of Fiction

    Open Access•Matthieu Fontaine•Critica•2020

  • Who tells your story

    Open Access•Alicia Muro•Language and Literature…•2025

  • Culpables impunes y narradores no fiables

    Kristine Vanden Berghe•Iberoromania•2021

  • Voir autrement » l'homosexualité masculine

    Open Access•Eloïse Grommerch•Études littéraires•2025

  • Fingierte Mündlichkeit in der Erzählkunst entwickelter Schriftkulturen

    Paul Goetsch•Poetica•1985

  • Sprache der Nähe — Sprache der Distanz. Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte

    Peter Koch, Wulf Oesterreicher•Romanistisches Jahrbuch•1985

  • Frames, Preferences, and the Reading of Third-Person Narratives

    Manfred Jahn•Poetics Today•1997

  • Drift and the Evolution of English Style

    Douglas Biber, Edward Finegan•Language•1989

Unique citing works7
Citations per year0,64
Citation span2015 - 2025 (11)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae