Foundations for Typologies of Texts
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4474635 |
|---|---|
| Authors | T A Van Dijk (0000-0001-5394-2630, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1972 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Publication date | 1972-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Semiotica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0037-1998 • E-ISSN: 1613-3692 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/semi.1972.6.4.297 |
| OpenAlex | W2072830718 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 4 |
ions from empirical reality.5 5 For discussion about classification in the social sciences, see Rudner (1966). This discussion of `types' in the social sciences has led to serious controversies. For a rather formal discussion see again Rudner (1966) and the well-known article by Hempel (1952) summing up and elaborating the book he wrote together with Oppenheim (Hempel and Oppenheim, 1936). Hempel refers to traditional discussions about types by such scholars as Weber, Sheldon, Kretschmer, Parsons, and others. A critique of Hempel's logical and comparative approach was given by Lazarsfeld (1962), who defended the `pragmatic' approach: the definition of methodological principies on the basis of concrete social research. Cf. furthermore Nagel (1961
Epistemology · Sociology · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Philosophy · Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,13 |
| Citation span | 1972 - 2024 (53) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |