Aboriginal Sovereignty and the Politics of Reconciliation
The Constituent Power of the Aboriginal Embassy in Australia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4476396 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paul Muldoon (0000-0002-7021-3592, Monash University), Andrew Schaap (0000-0001-9608-0129, Department of Politics, Amory Building, Rennes Drive, Exeter, Devon EX4 4RJ, England) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 534-550 |
| Publication date | 2012-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environment and Planning D Society and Space (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0263-7758 • E-ISSN: 1472-3433 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1068/d24310 |
| OpenAlex | W1983758629 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 16 |
As a reoccupation of land immediately in front of Parliament House for six months in 1972, the Aboriginal Embassy was an inspiring demonstration of Aboriginal self-determination and land rights. Since 1972 demonstrators have maintained an Embassy on the site as part of the continuing Aboriginal struggle. Significantly, on its twentieth anniversary in 1992 Embassy protestors declared Aboriginal sovereignty just as the state-initiated formal reconciliation process was getting underway in Australia. Within mainstream public discourse in Australia, reconciliation is understood as aligned with a progressive politics. In this paper we examine the reactionary politics of reconciliation vis-à-vis the struggle for land rights and sovereignty that the Embassy embodies. To this end we examine a debate within legal theory about the relation between 'constituted power' (state sovereignty) and 'constituent power' (democratic praxis). Following Antonio Negri, the Embassy can be understood as one manifestation of the constituent power of Aboriginal people (and their non-Aboriginal supporters) that the Australian state appropriates to shore up its own defective claim to sovereignty. We illustrate this by comparing the symbolism of the Aboriginal Embassy with that of Reconciliation Place in Canberra. We complicate this analysis by discussing how the Embassy strategically exploits the ambiguous status of Aboriginal people as citizens within and without the community presupposed by the Australian state. In doing so the Embassy makes present the possibility of a break with the colonial past that is often invoked in the politics of reconciliation but which the Australian state has failed to enact
Democracy · Political science · Politics · Popular sovereignty · Power (physics · Reactionary · Sociology · Sovereignty · State (computer science · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography · Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights · Law
The 'Uluru statement from the heart'
The Aboriginal Tent Embassy and the Limits of Values-Based Conservation
(Big) Data and the North- in -South
Epistemic Democracy and Political Reconciliation
Action Between the Legal and the Illegal
"Settler-Colonialism's "Miscarriage
Possibilities for reconciliation in heterotopic spaces of Australian frontier massacre
Citizenship without Community
Politics through a Web
Making space public' through occupation
Non-Indigenous Australians and the 'Responsibility to Engage
Introduction
The Politics of War Memory and Commemoration
Law and Agonistic Politics
Confronting amnesia
Mapping Australian Postcolonial Landscapes
Neoptolemus
Collapsing Australian architecture
Land rights and Aboriginal voices
The Sovereign Exceptions
Constitutional Democracy
Sorry, and not sorry, in Australia
Official apologies, reconciliation, and settler colonialism
Sovereign Spaces, Caring for Country, and the Homeless Position of Aboriginal Peoples
Imagining the Good Indigenous Citizen
In the Northern Territory Intervention, What is Saved or Rescued and at What Cost
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,86 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2025 (14) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |