Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Koppen Classification of Climates in North America

Bibliographic Data

ID4491900
AuthorsEdward A Ackerman (corresponding author)
Year1941
Volume31
Issue1
Pages105
Publication date1941-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGeographical Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0016-7428 • E-ISSN: 1931-0846
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/210420
OpenAlexW2329013713
LanguageEN
Citations received3

T HE Koppen classification of climates has been criticized from various points of view. Some geographers regard it with suspicion because Koppen's climatic divisions now and then show pronounced discrepancies from phenomena of the natural and cultural landscapes. According to this point of view the value of a climatic classification is lost when its criteria are too rigid. As the present meteorological observations are inadequate for a purely quantitative classification, it is maintained, every classification must be empirical at critical points. Hence no appearance of false accuracy should be given by allowing boundaries to depart very far from observable features. Others criticize the Koppen classification for being too empirical. It cannot be denied that the Koppen system is vulnerable on both sides. The rigid application of principles derived empirically has established in North America some theoretical climatic limits that are little more than arbitrary boundaries. The fact that central Massachusetts and central Florida are included in the same climatic region (Cfa), that Spokane, Wash., and Fresno, Calif., are in the same group (Csa), and that Vancouver, B. C., and Los Angeles are companions' illustrates the tenor of a criticism that no student of the landscape can ignore. Considered from the quantitative point of view also, the Koppen classification has obvious shortcomings. The use of mean yearly temperatures to establish the BS/BW and B/H boundaries, the use of empirical constants in the BS/BW and B/H formulas, and the purely empirical choice of thermal limits that establish other climatic boundaries are points that have been touched on many times in periodical literature.2 Although the only serious competitor of the K6ppen system, Thornthwaite's classification, corrects one deficiency, it is just as empirical as K6ppen's at critical points, and much more complicated.3 Evaporation data are derived from monthly, not yearly, means of precipitation and temperature; but the determination of

Geography · Physical geography · Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics · Climate variability and models · Species Distribution and Climate Change

  • The radiation index of dryness in Tasmania

    Open Access•M Nunez•Australian Geographical Studies•1978

  • Köppen After Fifty Years

    Arthur A Wilcock•Annals of the Association of…•1968

  • The Climates of the Argentine Retublic According to the New Thornthmaite Classification

    Juan Jacinto Burgos, A L Vidal et al.•Annals of the Association of…•1951

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,04
Citation span1951 - 1978 (28)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae