Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Traceability

Tracking and Privacy in the Food System

Dados Bibliográficos

ID4492019
AutoresDeborah E Popper (autor correspondente)
Ano2007
Volume97
Fascículo3
Páginas365-388
Data de publicação2007-07-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoGeographical Review (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0016-7428 • E-ISSN: 1931-0846
EditoraInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1931-0846.2007.tb00511.x
OpenAlexW2135173550
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas7
Referências citadas30

Lapses in food safety have spurred development of governmental traceability systems to track every stage of food production as part of a standardized information base. These systems form part of national and international government efforts to reduce food‐security risks and control food‐related disease outbreaks. The European Union, the United States, Japan, and Canada have traceability requirements now in various stages of implementation, as does the Codex Alimentarius. Traceability regulations require that, from farm (plant or animal) to fork, foods have a clear, verifiable record that tracks through all stages of cultivation, production, supplying, transporting, processing, and distribution. Traceability implies complete information control over the geography of one of life's most essential acts, eating. The apparent object of traceability is food, which seems to imply that human tracking is not part of the process, but food does not move on its own. Those people responsible at each stage for food transfers and transactions may go into the traceability database, making their locations part of the record and supporting precise monitoring of labor performance, consumer buying patterns, and ownership and management strategies. Given these capabilities, the development of public‐sector traceability systems demands careful consideration. Owners, especially large exporters and importers, are likely to see their needs and fears shape the system. The food workforce may well bear tracking's brunt. Consumers, the presumed beneficiaries of the systems, will probably resist direct incorporation (and full benefit), favoring their privacy over their safety

Agriculture · Business · Computer security · Economics · European union · Food processing · Food safety · Food security · Geography · Government (linguistics · International trade · Political science · Production (economics · Risk analysis (engineering · Traceability · Computer Science · Engineering · Food Safety and Hygiene · Food Science · Food Supply Chain Traceability · Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability · Law · Marketing

  • Istihsan Concept in Multi Contract Online Transactions of Go-Food Services in The Go-Jek Application

    Open Access•Lusiana Lusiana, Muhammad Harun et al.•Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari'ah…•2022

  • Code/Space

    Open Access•Rob Kitchin, Martin Dodge•Code/Space•2011

  • Collingridge's dilemma and the early ethical assessment of emerging technology

    Open Access•Jenifer A Buckley, Jenifer Buckley et al.•Technology in Society•2017

  • Biosecurity and more‐than‐human political economy

    Open Access•László Cseke•Transactions of the Institute of…•2022

  • The Object of Regulation

    Open Access•Nick Bingham, Stephanie Lavau•Environment and Planning A…•2012

  • Software, Objects, and Home Space

    Open Access•Martin Dodge, Rob Kitchin•Environment and Planning A…•2009

  • Practices of attention, possibilities for care

    Open Access•Stephanie Lavau, Nick Bingham•The Sociological Review•2017

  • Worlds of Food

    Kevin Morgan, Terry Marsden et al.•Worlds of food•2006

  • French Beans and Food Scares

    Susanne Freidberg•French Beans and Food Scares•2004

  • Food, Morals and Meaning

    John Coveney•Food, morals, and meaning•2006

  • From Columbus to ConAgra

    Alessandro Bonanno•From Columbus to ConAgra•1994

  • Civic Agriculture

    Thomas A Lyson•Civic Agriculture•2021

  • Making Food Safety an Issue

    Open Access•Patrick Zylberman•Medical History•2004

  • Kill and Chill

    Ian Maclachlan•Kill and Chill•2001

  • Networking knowledge in the sustainable agriculture movement

    Neva Hassanein•Society & Natural Resources•1997

  • Consuming geographies. We are where we eat

    Open Access•P Corrigan•Journal of Rural Studies•1998

  • Tangled Routes

    C D Deere, Deborah Barndt•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•2003

  • Cutting into the Meatpacking Line

    Susan Porter Benson, Deborah Fink•Journal of American History•1999

  • Global Food Politics

    Philip Mcmichael•Monthly Review•1998

  • Globalization and the Changing Networks of Food Supply

    Open Access•Hazel Barrett, Hazel R Barrett et al.•Transactions of the Institute of…•1999

  • Against the Grain

    Ann Reisner•Agricultural History•2005

  • Opening Spaces through Relocalization

    Open Access•M Hendrickson, Mary K Hendrickson et al.•Sociologia Ruralis•2002

  • Sacred Cow, Mad Cow

    Open Access•Penny Van Esterik, Madeleine Ferrières et al.•Anthropologica•2006

  • Determinants of Food Safety Risks

    Open Access•Andrew Knight, Andrew J Knight et al.•Rural Sociology•2005

  • Explaining the Diversity of Southeast Asian Shrimp Aquaculture

    Open Access•Derek Hall•Journal of Agrarian Change•2004

Obras citantes distintas7
Citações por ano0,41
Intervalo de citações2009 - 2022 (14)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 7
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae