Traceability
Tracking and Privacy in the Food System
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 4492019 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Deborah E Popper (autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2007 |
| Volume | 97 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 365-388 |
| Data de publicação | 2007-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Geographical Review (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0016-7428 • E-ISSN: 1931-0846 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2007.tb00511.x |
| OpenAlex | W2135173550 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 7 |
| Referências citadas | 30 |
Lapses in food safety have spurred development of governmental traceability systems to track every stage of food production as part of a standardized information base. These systems form part of national and international government efforts to reduce food‐security risks and control food‐related disease outbreaks. The European Union, the United States, Japan, and Canada have traceability requirements now in various stages of implementation, as does the Codex Alimentarius. Traceability regulations require that, from farm (plant or animal) to fork, foods have a clear, verifiable record that tracks through all stages of cultivation, production, supplying, transporting, processing, and distribution. Traceability implies complete information control over the geography of one of life's most essential acts, eating. The apparent object of traceability is food, which seems to imply that human tracking is not part of the process, but food does not move on its own. Those people responsible at each stage for food transfers and transactions may go into the traceability database, making their locations part of the record and supporting precise monitoring of labor performance, consumer buying patterns, and ownership and management strategies. Given these capabilities, the development of public‐sector traceability systems demands careful consideration. Owners, especially large exporters and importers, are likely to see their needs and fears shape the system. The food workforce may well bear tracking's brunt. Consumers, the presumed beneficiaries of the systems, will probably resist direct incorporation (and full benefit), favoring their privacy over their safety
Agriculture · Business · Computer security · Economics · European union · Food processing · Food safety · Food security · Geography · Government (linguistics · International trade · Political science · Production (economics · Risk analysis (engineering · Traceability · Computer Science · Engineering · Food Safety and Hygiene · Food Science · Food Supply Chain Traceability · Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability · Law · Marketing
Istihsan Concept in Multi Contract Online Transactions of Go-Food Services in The Go-Jek Application
Code/Space
Collingridge's dilemma and the early ethical assessment of emerging technology
Biosecurity and more‐than‐human political economy
The Object of Regulation
Software, Objects, and Home Space
Practices of attention, possibilities for care
Worlds of Food
French Beans and Food Scares
Food, Morals and Meaning
From Columbus to ConAgra
Civic Agriculture
Making Food Safety an Issue
Kill and Chill
Networking knowledge in the sustainable agriculture movement
Consuming geographies. We are where we eat
Tangled Routes
Cutting into the Meatpacking Line
Global Food Politics
Globalization and the Changing Networks of Food Supply
Against the Grain
Opening Spaces through Relocalization
Sacred Cow, Mad Cow
Determinants of Food Safety Risks
Explaining the Diversity of Southeast Asian Shrimp Aquaculture
| Obras citantes distintas | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,41 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2009 - 2022 (14) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 7 |