Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Niall Ferguson's Imperial Passion

Bibliographic Data

ID4493466
AuthorsJon Wilson (0000-0002-0398-8259, corresponding author)
Year2003
Volume56
Issue1
Pages175-183
Publication date2003-10-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHistory Workshop Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1363-3554 • E-ISSN: 1477-4569
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/hwj/56.1.175
OpenAlexW1992021882
LanguageEN
Citations received8

Niall Ferguson's Channel Four series ‘Empire’ is a missed opportunity. Ferguson's argument is that historians and politicians have emphasized the sins rather than the virtues of the British Empire. In making this point, Ferguson's series subscribes to the classic dilemma of imperial discourse. Ferguson's ‘Empire’ is depicted as having been a dynamic agent of change in the past. But it also portrays the non‐European world as static, timeless and in need of European – or now American – intervention in the future. Ferguson's ‘Empire’ has more to say about the search for a British identity after decolonization than about the British empire itself. He portrays the non‐European world as a scenic backdrop for the great (and occasionally not‐ so‐great) deeds of a few white men overseas. His attempt to tell a story about the relationship between Britain and the rest of the world ends up becoming a tale told about Britain alone. Television offers the opportunity for an intelligent and popular portrayal of the complexity of imperial relations – of the ways in which the engagement and encounter between Europeans and others made Britain and the post‐colonial non‐European world. It would emphasize the existence of many different imperial stories, and stress the extent to which ‘Empire’ meant many different things in different places. Such a TV history would make it difficult to moralize; but TV producers need to realize that good television history doesn't have to offer coherent moral conclusions.

Aesthetics · Ancient history · Argument (complex analysis) · Art · British Empire · Colonialism · Decolonization · Empire · Identity (music) · Passion · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Australian History and Society · History · Law · Psychology

  • Reality, Identity and Empathy

    T Hunt•Journal of Social History•2006

  • Mythen in deutschsprachigen Geschichtsschulbüchern

    Open Access•Roland Bernhard, Susanne Grindel et al.•Mythen in deutschsprachigen…•2017

  • Interfacing the Nation

    Open Access•James Bennett•Convergence The International…•2008

  • Empire, Cultures and Identities in Nineteenth‐ and Twentieth‐Century Britain

    Open Access•Simon J Potter•History Compass•2006

  • Empathy and enfranchisement

    Jerome De Groot•Rethinking History•2006

  • Echoes of Britannia

    N C Fleming•Contemporary British History•2010

  • Colonial Fragility

    Open Access•Riley Linebaugh•The Journal of Imperial &…•2022

  • Before the history boom

    Open Access•Dafydd Sills-Jones•Critical Studies in Television…•2016

Citations per year0.4
Citation span2006 - 2022 (17)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae