Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Sanctioning Laughter in Stalin's Soviet Union

Bibliographic Data

ID4495009
AuthorsJ Waterlow, J C Waterlow (University of Oxford, corresponding author)
Year2015
Volume79
Issue1
Pages198-214
Publication date2015-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHistory Workshop Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1363-3554 • E-ISSN: 1477-4569
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/hwj/dbv006
OpenAlexW2016805773
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited9

Laughter and humour in Stalin’s Soviet Union have long been considered weapons, wielded most effectively by the state against its (perceived) enemies, but also by the populace in acts of resistance aimed against the repressive regime in which they lived. This article argues that both these perspectives are misleading. The Soviet state in fact had a frequently ambiguous, evolving attitude to humour and its uses. At times, the humour of state and people even overlapped – particularly when attacking the caprice and foolishness of local bureaucrats – but the article emphasizes that the function and hence meaning of this humour differed radically depending upon who told a given joke and their position of power relative to its target. Ordinary people’s humour in the USSR was frequently reflexive: it was not aimed at the Soviet system, but represented Schadenfreude at one’s own misfortunes. In contrast to Merziger’s ‘German humour’, which ‘blocked everything disturbing out’, Soviet citizens used humour to bring the disturbing in, and to diminish its power through laughter. Nevertheless, the state considered political humour to be ‘antisoviet agitation’, and punished many joke-tellers accordingly. Despite this, the article demonstrates that such punishment was inconsistently enforced; in the USSR, laughter was not simply sanctioned, but was frequently recontextualized and reinterpreted.

Aesthetics · Art · Foolishness · Joke · Laughter · Literature · Political science · Politics · Power (physics) · Sociology · Solidarity · Soviet union · State (computer science) · Eastern European Communism and Reforms · Italian Fascism and Post-war Society · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Philosophy

  • Why so serious? Tragedy and whimsy in late Soviet and post-Soviet Russian monuments

    Aaron J Cohen•Canadian Slavonic Papers•2021

  • Peasant rebels under Stalin

    Lynne Viola•Peasant rebels under Stalin•1999

  • Stalin

    David Brandenberger•Canadian-American Slavic Studies•2010

  • Everything Was Forever, Until It Was No More

    Alexei Yurchak•Everything Was Forever, until It…•2013

  • The crime of "anti-Soviet agitation" in the Soviet Union in the 1930's

    Sarah Davies•Cahiers du monde russe•1998

  • Reflective Laughter

    Олег Минин, Oleg A Minin et al.•The Slavic and East European…•2005

  • Tol'ko odin god

    Alexandra Tolstoy, Svetlana Alliluyeva•The Russian Review•1970

  • There Is Nothing Funny about It

    Open Access•Natalia Skradol•Slavic Review•2011

  • The social meanings of swearing

    A Smith, Smith et al.•Past & Present•1998

  • Laughing with Comrade Stalin

    Open Access•Natalia Skradol•The Russian Review•2009

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,2
Citation span2021 - 2021 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae