Strange loops
Producing history in financial times
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4495290 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Amin Samman (0000-0003-4721-4877, City, University of London, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 148-156 |
| Publication date | 2020-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Finance and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2059-5999 • E-ISSN: 2059-5999 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2218/finsoc.v6i2.5276 |
| OpenAlex | W3118465305 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 10 |
In this rejoinder, I discuss three fundamental deadlocks raised by contributors to this forum. These relate to the status of historical discourse, financial market logics, and above all the figure of the 'strange loop', which I put forward as a means of reorienting historical thought. I also offer some preliminary remarks on why History in Financial Times departs from conventional forms of historicism in political economy, as well as a further set of reflections on the contemporaneity of the book's argumentation
Business · Economics · Financial system · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |