"The Concept "System of Philosophy
The Case of Jacob Brucker's Historiography of Philosophy1
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4495371 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Leo Catana (0000-0002-5299-1833, University of Copenhagen, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 72-90 |
| Publication date | 2005-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | History and Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0018-2656 • E-ISSN: 1468-2303 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1468-2303.2005.00309.x |
| OpenAlex | W2158587977 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
In this essay I examine and discuss the concept “system of philosophy” as a methodological tool in the history of philosophy; I do so in two moves. First I analyze the historical origin of the concept in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Thereafter I undertake a discussion of its methodological weaknesses–a discussion that is not only relevant to the writing of history of philosophy in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, but also to the writing of history of philosophy in our times, where the concept remains an important methodological tool. My first move is to analyze Jacob Brucker's employment of the concept in his influential history of philosophy, Historia critica philosophiae, dating from 1742–1744. To Brucker, a “system of philosophy” is characterized by the following four features: (a) it is autonomous in regard to other, non-philosophical disciplines; (b) all doctrines stated within the various branches of philosophy can be deduced from one principle; (c) as an autonomous system it comprises all branches of philosophy; (d) the doctrines stated within these various branches of philosophy are internally coherent. Brucker employed the concept on the entire history of philosophy, and he gave it a defining role in regard to two other methodological concepts, namely “eclecticism” and “syncretism,” which he regarded as more or less successful forms of systematic philosophy. My second move is to point out the weakness of the concept of “system of philosophy” as a methodological tool in the history of philosophy. I argue that the interdisciplinary nature of much premodern philosophy makes Brucker's methodological concept “system of philosophy” inadequate, and that we may be better off leaving it behind in our future exploration of premodern philosophy
Eclecticism · Epistemology · Historiography · Modern philosophy · Philosophy education · Philosophy of history · Philosophy of sport · Western philosophy · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Historical and Literary Studies · Historical Philosophy and Science · History · Philosophy
A Philosophy of the Patriarchs
Leonardo Da Vinci nin Sistematik Bir Felsefesi Olup Olmadığına Dair Felsefi Bir İnceleme
L’histoire de la philosophie appartient-elle au champ des sciences humaines et sociales
Utility, Reason and Rhetoric
Was Feyerabend a Popperian? Methodological issues in the History of the Philosophy of Science
Diderot, l’éclectisme et l’histoire de l’esprit humain
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,55 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2023 (9) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |