Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

"The Concept "System of Philosophy

The Case of Jacob Brucker's Historiography of Philosophy1

Bibliographic Data

ID4495371
AuthorsLeo Catana (0000-0002-5299-1833, University of Copenhagen, corresponding author)
Year2005
Volume44
Issue1
Pages72-90
Publication date2005-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHistory and Theory (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0018-2656 • E-ISSN: 1468-2303
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1468-2303.2005.00309.x
OpenAlexW2158587977
LanguageEN
Citations received6

In this essay I examine and discuss the concept “system of philosophy” as a methodological tool in the history of philosophy; I do so in two moves. First I analyze the historical origin of the concept in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Thereafter I undertake a discussion of its methodological weaknesses–a discussion that is not only relevant to the writing of history of philosophy in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, but also to the writing of history of philosophy in our times, where the concept remains an important methodological tool. My first move is to analyze Jacob Brucker's employment of the concept in his influential history of philosophy, Historia critica philosophiae, dating from 1742–1744. To Brucker, a “system of philosophy” is characterized by the following four features: (a) it is autonomous in regard to other, non-philosophical disciplines; (b) all doctrines stated within the various branches of philosophy can be deduced from one principle; (c) as an autonomous system it comprises all branches of philosophy; (d) the doctrines stated within these various branches of philosophy are internally coherent. Brucker employed the concept on the entire history of philosophy, and he gave it a defining role in regard to two other methodological concepts, namely “eclecticism” and “syncretism,” which he regarded as more or less successful forms of systematic philosophy. My second move is to point out the weakness of the concept of “system of philosophy” as a methodological tool in the history of philosophy. I argue that the interdisciplinary nature of much premodern philosophy makes Brucker's methodological concept “system of philosophy” inadequate, and that we may be better off leaving it behind in our future exploration of premodern philosophy

Eclecticism · Epistemology · Historiography · Modern philosophy · Philosophy education · Philosophy of history · Philosophy of sport · Western philosophy · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Historical and Literary Studies · Historical Philosophy and Science · History · Philosophy

  • A Philosophy of the Patriarchs

    Haim Mahlev•Journal of the History of Ideas•2015

  • Leonardo Da Vinci nin Sistematik Bir Felsefesi Olup Olmadığına Dair Felsefi Bir İnceleme

    Open Access•Orkan ERNALBANT•Mediterranean Journal of Humanities•2023

  • L’histoire de la philosophie appartient-elle au champ des sciences humaines et sociales

    Open Access•Catherine König-Pralong•Revue d Histoire des Sciences…•2017

  • Utility, Reason and Rhetoric

    Open Access•Antis Loizides•Utilitas•2019

  • Was Feyerabend a Popperian? Methodological issues in the History of the Philosophy of Science

    Open Access•Matteo Collodel•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2016

  • Diderot, l’éclectisme et l’histoire de l’esprit humain

    Open Access•Mitia Rioux-Beaulne•Dialogue•2018

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0,55
Citation span2015 - 2023 (9)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae