Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Psychological Basis of Historical Explanation

Reenactment, Simulation, and the Fusion of Horizons

Bibliographic Data

ID4495526
AuthorsKarsten R Stueber (0000-0002-5176-4946, College of the Holy Cross, corresponding author)
Year2002
Volume41
Issue1
Pages25-42
Publication date2002-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHistory and Theory (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0018-2656 • E-ISSN: 1468-2303
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1468-2303.00189
OpenAlexW2012780268
LanguageEN
Citations received10

In this article I will challenge a received orthodoxy in the philosophy of social science by showing that Collingwood was right in insisting that reenactment is epistemically central for historical explanations of individual agency. Situating Collingwood within the context of the debate between simulation theory and what has come to be called "theory theory" in contemporary philosophy of mind and psychology, I will develop two systematic arguments that attempt to show the essential importance of reenactment for our understanding of rational agency. I will furthermore show that Gadamer's influential critique of the reenactment model distinguishes insufficiently between the interpretation of certain types of texts and the explanation of individual actions. In providing an account of individual agency, we are committed to a realistic understanding of our ordinary scheme of action-explanations and have thus to recognize the centrality of reenactment. Nevertheless, Collingwood's emphasis on reenactment is certainly one-sided. I will demonstrate its limitations even for accounting for individual agency, and show how it has to be supplemented by various theoretical considerations, by analyzing the different explanatory strategies that Christopher Browning and Daniel Goldhagen use to explain the behavior of the ordinary men in Reserve Battalion 101 during World War II

Philosophy, History, and Historiography · Political Theory and Influence · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought

  • Gadamer y Collingwood sobre la distancia temporal y la comprensión

    Open Access•Chinatsu Kobayashi, Manier Marion et al.•Revista CS•2012

  • Introduction

    Vanessa Agnew•Criticism•2004

  • Arqueología experimental con fines de investigación en la reconstrucción de caballería feudal europea del siglo XI. El caballero normando

    Open Access•Darío Español Solana, Laura Jiménez Martínez et al.•Panta Rei•2022

  • Afterthoughts on biases in history perception

    Open Access•Maciej Dymkowski•Polish Psychological Bulletin•2010

  • The Causal Autonomy of Reason Explanations and How Not to Worry about Causal Deviance

    Open Access•Karsten R Stueber•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2013

  • How to Think about Rules and Rule Following

    Open Access•Karsten R Stueber•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2005

  • A Moderate Hermeneutical Approach to Empathy in History Education

    Tyson Retz•Educational Philosophy and Theory•2013

  • Educating in History

    Open Access•José-Manuel González González, Jesús-Gerardo Franco-Calvo et al.•Social Sciences•2022

  • Dewey

    Serge Grigoriev•Journal of the Philosophy of…•2012

  • The Ideal Explanatory Text in History

    Open Access•Tor Egil Førland•History and Theory•2004

Unique citing works10
Citations per year0,45
Citation span2004 - 2022 (19)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae