Discipline, Philosophy, and History
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 4495897 |
|---|---|
| Autores | John H Zammito (0000-0003-3831-8383, Rice University, autor de correspondencia), John Zammito |
| Año | 2010 |
| Volumen | 49 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 289-303 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2010-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | History and Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0018-2656 • E-ISSN: 1468-2303 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1468-2303.2010.00544.x |
| OpenAlex | W1995788542 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
Gorman proposes to investigate historical practice under the rubric of a philosophy of disciplines. Such philosophy must first "recover historically" the self-constitution of the discipline in order then to appraise its procedures for warranting claims. Gorman's concept of discipline would have profited from consulting the substantial body of empirical research and theory regarding disciplinarity, and his "historical recovery" of the discipline of history leaves a lot to be desired. These insufficiencies vitiate the interesting arguments he has to offer concerning the question of the truth-claims of whole historical accounts. A better reconstruction of disciplinarity might also have provided him with stronger rejoinders to the postmodern challenge to historical practice that he sees himself called to rebut
Analytic philosophy · Comparative historical research · Constitution · Contemporary philosophy · Epistemology · Order (exchange) · Philosophy of history · Political science · Postmodernism · Rubric · Social science · Sociology · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy, History, and Historiography
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,17 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2020 - 2020 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |