Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Marx and Morgan

Bibliographic Data

ID4495948
AuthorsWilliam H Shaw (corresponding author)
Year1984
Volume23
Issue2
Pages215
Publication date1984-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHistory and Theory (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0018-2656 • E-ISSN: 1468-2303
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2505007
OpenAlexW2332015619
LanguageEN
Citations received4

Marx held that human society prior to the dawning of civilization represented a kind of communism, and this belief is widely thought to lend a rather tidy cyclical form to the pattern of history envisioned by historical materialism. This primitive -marked, as is communism proper, by the absence of socioeconomic classes -is the exception, noted by Engels, to the Communist Manifesto's claim that the history of all hitherto existing society has been the history of class struggle.1 On the other hand, Marx and Engels thought that early society offered no exception to their materialist conception of history; indeed, they held that scientific studies of society only corroborated their theory. Although Marx interpreted pre-history as conforming to his overall theory of historical development, he never elaborated fully his picture of primordial communism. Toward the end of his career, however, he became engrossed in historical anthropology. In the last years of his life, Marx buried himself in ethnological investigations. He was particularly enthusiastic about the work of the American anthropologist Lewis Henry Morgan, wrote ninety-six pages of manuscript notes on the latter's Ancient Society2 and, according to Engels, intended to present to the German public Morgan's results along with some conclusions from his own investigations.3 A year after Marx's death, Engels wrote The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State-subtitled In the Light of the Researches of Lewis H. ostensibly to fulfill this bequeathed project, drawing not only on Ancient Society but also on Marx's extracts and notes. Engels too, evinced nothing but the highest regard for Morgan's book. Describing it as one of the few epoch-making works of our time, he wrote that Morgan rediscovered in America, in his own way, the materialist conception of history that had been discovered by Marx forty years ago, and in his comparison of barbarism and civilisation was led by this conception to the same conclusions, in the main points, as Marx had arrived at.4

Epistemology · History · Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism

  • Common‐pool resource governance and uneven food security

    Open Access•E Flaherty•Journal of Agrarian Change•2021

  • Where is the Southeastern Native American economy

    A Kowalewski, V D Thompson•Southeastern Archaeology•2020

  • Where Did Red Go

    Yael Ben-Zvi•CR The New Centennial Review•2007

  • The Maya Enlightenment

    Open Access•Panos Kratimenos•Cambridge Archaeological Journal•2025

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,21
Citation span2007 - 2025 (19)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae