Hegel and Pathologized Modernity, or the End of Spirit in the Anthropocene
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4496057 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Simon Lumsden (0000-0002-1561-7623, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 371-389 |
| Publication date | 2018-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | History and Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0018-2656 • E-ISSN: 1468-2303 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/hith.12070 |
| OpenAlex | W2892074192 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
This article has two broad concerns, both of which are pursued primarily with reference to Hegel's philosophy of history. First, it examines whether Hegel can help explain the difficulty we have in modernity in responding to climate change and ecological crisis. It argues that Hegel provides a useful analysis of this problem, since the model of self-determination that he appeals to is comprehensively embedded in embodied forms of culture. This helps explain why even a self-correcting worldview like modernity is obdurate in the face of this crisis. Second, Hegel claims that the defining attribute of spirit is its capacity for self-production. Modernity is characterized by the emerging and widespread knowledge that spirit is self-producing. Modernity develops institutions that facilitate and provide an objective reality for spirit's self-production and its freedom. This aspect of the article examines whether the distinctive capacity of spirit for self-determination, which is realized in modernity, is subject to the same atrophying conditions by which Hegel says all other historical shapes of spirit are characterized. It asks if the present ecological crisis, something that is directly attributable to spirit itself, represents the limits of self-producing spirit. The article concludes by examining the difficult position of those countries that cannot be considered to be responsible for the emergence of the Anthropocene but whose actions in the present will amplify its impact
Aesthetics · Anthropocene · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Face (sociological concept) · Hegelianism · Modernity · Social science · Sociology · Subject (documents) · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,67 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2023 (4) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |