Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

When the Monograph Is No Longer the Medium

Historical Narrative in the Online Age1

Datos Bibliográficos

ID4496423
AutoresAnn Rigney (0000-0002-7181-8323, Utrecht University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2010
Volumen49
Número4
Páginas100-117
Fecha de publicación2010-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaHistory and Theory (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0018-2656 • E-ISSN: 1468-2303
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1468-2303.2010.00562.x
OpenAlexW2157573876
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas11

Over the last fifty years there has been much discussion about the value of narrative in the production of historical knowledge whereby it is generally assumed that "narrative" is a given and that the only thing at issue is its epistemological value. This article critically examines this assumption. It shows how conceptions of "narrative" have mutated in response to changes in cultural practice and, as importantly, how they have been implicitly modeled on the particular medium envisaged for telling stories: the stand-alone monograph. The belief that history's natural form is a book written by an individual historian has thus informed most discussions of narrative in the twentieth century, meaning that the primacy of language, the autonomy of the author, and the finished, self-contained character of the work have been taken for granted. The "naturalness" of the stand-alone monograph can no longer be taken as a given, however, in the new media ecologies. Digitization and the internet offer new technologies for producing and disseminating historical knowledge and, in the process, present both opportunities and challenges to professional historians. Beyond their practical implications, the digital media also provide a new theoretical model for viewing historical narrative in terms of its social production by multiple agents across different platforms, and this changes our understanding both of past and of future practices

Aesthetics · Art · Digitization · Epistemology · Literature · Meaning (existential) · Narrative · Narrative criticism · Narrative history · Narrative network · Sociology · Value (mathematics) · Computer Science · Digital Humanities and Scholarship · History · Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis · Philosophy

  • Virada digital? Pesquisa histórica no ciberespaço

    Open Access•A P Leme Lopes•Revista Tempo e Argumento•2018

  • A case study in Gantt charts as historiophoty

    Michael R W Dawson•History of Psychology•2013

  • Disconnective futures

    Zoltán B Simon•Frontiers of Narrative Studies•2024

  • Playing the past

    Open Access•Na Li•Convergence The International…•2021

  • Digital Commemorations of Slave Revolt

    Sarah Juliet Lauro•History of the Present•2020

  • The Romanian “Latchkey Generation” writes back

    Open Access•Codruţa Alina Pohrib•Memory Studies•2017

  • Disciplinary commitments of history and reading practices of historical writing

    Jakub Muchowski•Rethinking History•2025

  • What is shared and what is not

    Open Access•Vatthana Pholsena•Journal of Southeast Asian Studies•2024

  • Emplotment as Epic in Archaeological Writing

    R G Lesure•Norwegian Archaeological Review•2015

  • Os limites da experimentação formal nos periódicos acadêmicos

    Open Access•Mariana De Moraes Silveira•Varia Historia•2023

  • Mapping a Slave Revolt

    Vincent Brown•Social Text•2015

Obras citantes distintas11
Citas por año0,85
Intervalo de citas2013 - 2025 (13)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 9
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae