China and Venezuela
South-South Cooperation or Rearticulated Dependency
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 4500762 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Emma Miriam Yin-Hang To, Rodolfo Acuna (0000-0001-8564-0477), Rodrigo Acuña |
| Ano | 2019 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 126-140 |
| Data de publicação | 2019-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Latin American Perspectives (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0094-582X • E-ISSN: 1552-678X |
| Editora | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0094582x18813574 |
| OpenAlex | W2902787202 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 11 |
| Referências citadas | 13 |
China's increased participation in the world market and its consequent demand for energy has contributed to exacerbating the vulnerability of many externally oriented resource-rich countries. As a consequence, since the early 2000s the relationship between China and Venezuela has gone far beyond trade to an "energy cooperation" model with joint ventures and development funds not only in oil but also in nonresource sectors of the Venezuelan economy. Despite massive increases in social expenditure, Latin American theorists arguing from a neo-dependency perspective have questioned the long-term benefits of this so-called cooperation. They have characterized the relationship as "neoextractivist" in reference to the historically dependent relationship between Latin America and countries in the Global North. Whether the relationship is seen as based on South-South cooperation or on rearticulated global political and economic inequalities depends on whether the focus is on the behavior of the Chinese state and Chinese companies or on bilateral agreements between the two states. Although politically the relationship is based on cooperation, economically it displays many of the structural problems that Venezuela has faced since the discovery of oil. La mayor participación de China en el mercado mundial y la consiguiente demanda de energía han contribuido a exacerbar la vulnerabilidad de muchos países ricos en recursos con orientación externa. Como consecuencia, desde principios de la década de 2000, la relación entre China y Venezuela ha ido mucho más allá del comercio a un modelo de "cooperación energética" con empresas conjuntas y fondos de desarrollo no solo en el sector petrolero sino también en los sectores de la economía venezolana fuera de los recursos. A pesar de los aumentos masivos en el gasto social, los teóricos latinoamericanos que argumentan desde una perspectiva neo-dependentista han cuestionado los beneficios a largo plazo de esta llamada cooperación. Han caracterizado la relación como "neoextractivista" en referencia a la relación históricamente dependiente entre América Latina y los países del Norte Global. Si se considera que la relación se basa en la cooperación Sur-Sur o en desigualdades políticas y económicas globales rearticuladas depende de si la atención se centra en el comportamiento del estado chino y las empresas chinas o en los acuerdos bilaterales entre los dos estados. Aunque políticamente la relación se basa en la cooperación, económicamente muestra muchos de los problemas estructurales que Venezuela ha enfrentado desde el descubrimiento del petróleo
Vulnerability · International Development and Aid · International Relations in Latin America · Natural Resources and Economic Development
South–South Cooperation and global development in a multipolar world
Maduro, Chavismo E Bolivarianismo
Hegemon or South-South partner? The ambiguity of Chinese foreign direct investment in Peru
The Multiple Voices of the United Nations on the Venezuelan and Nicaraguan Crises
Stretching the Limits of Balance of Threat Theory
The evolution of the national discourse on Chinese mining in Ecuador
Divergent status-seeking in elite clubs
How Economic Ties Shape Views of China
Problem Venezuele u spoljnoj politici Sjedinjenih Država
Chinese Foreign Direct Investment and the Myth of Autocracy Spread in Latin America
Elite Dynamics and China's Influence in Latin America
| Obras citantes distintas | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1,83 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 11 |