The Differential Effects of Comprehensive Feedback Forms in the Second Language Writing Class
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4502115 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marisela Bonilla López (0000-0002-1194-7721, KU Leuven, corresponding author), Elke Van Steendam (0000-0002-1910-9634, KU Leuven), Dirk Speelman (0000-0003-1561-1851, KU Leuven), Kris Buyse (0000-0003-1112-1708, KU Leuven) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 68 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 813-850 |
| Publication date | 2018-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Language Learning (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0023-8333 • E-ISSN: 1467-9922 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/lang.12295 |
| OpenAlex | W2808587213 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 21 |
| References cited | 74 |
This study investigated the potential of comprehensive corrective feedback forms as editing and learning tools and examined their effect on learners' cognitive and attitudinal engagement. Low-intermediate second language writers (N = 139) were randomly assigned to four experimental conditions (direct corrections of grammatical errors, metalinguistic codes for grammatical errors, direct corrections of grammatical and nongrammatical errors, or metalinguistic codes for grammatical and nongrammatical errors) and a control group (self-correction). Results from mixed-effects linear models showed that although direct corrections and codes were effective for enhancing learners' immediate grammatical and nongrammatical accuracy (i.e., during text revision), a long-term advantage (i.e., 4 weeks after feedback provision) was only evident for direct corrections. A mental effort measure of cognitive load revealed that participants' cognitive load was significantly lower when processing direct corrections targeting grammar issues. Questionnaire answers also yielded a significant attitudinal difference between the direct feedback groups and their metalinguistic counterparts.Open PracticesThis article has been awarded an Open Materials badge. Study materials are publicly accessible in the IRIS digital repository at https://www.iris-database.org. Learn more about the Open Practices badges from the Center for Open Science: https://osf.io/tvyxz/wiki
Class (philosophy) · Cognition · Cognitive Load · Cognitive psychology · Control (management) · Corrective Feedback · Differential effects · Grammar · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Psychology · Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Exploring the impact of form and content feedback on EFL writing proficiency
The Effect of Comprehensive Written Corrective Feedback on EFL Learners’ Written Syntactic Accuracy
Teacher- Versus AI-Generated (Poe Application) Corrective Feedback and Language Learners’ Writing Anxiety, Complexity, Fluency, and Accuracy
A comparative study of direct vs. coded written corrective feedback and revision on writing performance
Examining the effects of comprehensive written corrective feedback on L2 EAP students’ linguistic performance
Cyclical interplay between L2 writing, WCF processing and rewriting
Utility of focused/comprehensive written corrective feedback research for authentic L2 writing classrooms
Cognitive Diagnosis of EFL Integrated Writing under Interactive Noise Input Conditions
The importance of seeking feedback for benefiting from feedback
Why students fail to revise? Analysis of written metalinguistic feedback and cognitive effort on revision success
Written corrective feedback, learner-internal cognitive processes, and the acquisition of regular past tense by Chinese L2 learners of English
The efficacy of written corrective feedback
A typology of metalinguistic feedback
The effect of highly focused versus mid-focused written corrective feedback on EFL learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge development
Does asking learners to revise add to the effect of written corrective feedback on L2 acquisition
The grass is not always greener
Exploring factors contributing to feedback-seeking strategies in L2 writing
Research Trends of Written Corrective Feedback in L2 Writing
Feedback, Response, and Learner Development
Teacher written corrective feedback
The relative effects of corrective feedback and language proficiency on the development of L2 pragmalinguistic competence
Cognition and Second Language Instruction
Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition and Writing
Cognitive Load Theory
Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback
Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load
The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students
On multi-level modeling of data from repeated measures designs
Attention
Evidence in support of written corrective feedback
Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics
Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory
Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks
Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills
Epilogue
Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models
Attention and Memory during SLA
The Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in Improving L2 Written Accuracy
Second Language Writing Research and Written Corrective Feedback in Sla
Corrective Feedback and Teacher Development
A typology of written corrective feedback types
The comparative effect of direct written corrective feedback and metalinguistic explanation on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article
Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers
Methodological synthesis of research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback in L2 writing
Instructional Efficiency
The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing
Learners’ Processing, Uptake, and Retention of Corrective Feedback on Writing
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
Cognitive Load During Problem Solving
LmerTest Package
The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education
The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1
The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development
The Effect of Direct and Indirect Corrective Feedback on L2 Learners’ Written Accuracy
Comprehensive corrective feedback on low and high proficiency writers
A Vygotskian Perspective on Corrective Feedback in L2
International Handbook of Survey Methodology
The effect of focused and unfocused indirect written corrective feedback on EFL learners’ accuracy in new pieces of writing
Coded and uncoded error feedback
The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context
Focusing on form
Research into practice
Feedback on second language students' writing
Student Reactions to Teacher Response in Multiple-Draft Composition Classrooms
The Effect of Focused Written Corrective Feedback and Language Aptitude on ESL Learners' Acquisition of Articles
Effects of Dynamic Corrective Feedback on ESL Writing Accuracy
A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning
Effects of the Red Pen
Error feedback in L2 writing classes
Cognitive Complexity and Task Sequencing
Evidence on the Effectiveness of Comprehensive Error Correction in Second Language Writing
Attention, Memory, and the "Noticing" Hypothesis
The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes
| Unique citing works | 21 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 21 |