The Chemical Workshop Tradition and the Experimental Practice
Discontinuities within Continuities
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4516072 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ursula Klein (Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1996 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 251-287 |
| Publication date | 1996-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science in Context (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0269-8897 • E-ISSN: 1474-0664 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0269889700002507 |
| OpenAlex | W2134893803 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 18 |
The ArgumentThe overall portrayal of early modern experimentation as a new method of securing assent within a philosophical discourse sketched in many of the recent studies on the historical origin of experimentation is questioned by the analysis of the experimental practice of chemistry at the Paris Academy. Chemical experimentation at the Paris Academy in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth century originated in a different tradition than the philosophical. It continued and developed the material culture of the chemical work shops of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, and explored epistemic objects which had rather loose connections to philosophy. On the other hand, I argue against the classical dichotomy between the work of the mind that of the hand, and for an epistemology of experimentation that acknowledges that experimental manipulation goes hand in hand with reflexion. In particuler, I argue against the view that chemists at the Paris Academy were "pragmatists" who merely gathered experimental facts and classified substances and operations without perplexing themselves over general conceptions. I claim that the chemists at the Paris Academy constructed a general conception framework which shaped the significance of their experiments. This conception that I call conception of the chemical combination, compound and reaction was rather quickly reified into an experimental fact. Despite its generality it was a genuine chemical conception rather independent of philosophy
Epistemology · Generality · Philosophy of science · Pragmatism · Sociology · Chemistry · History of Science and Medicine · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Probability and Statistical Research · Psychology
The Element of the Table
Contemplating the Finger
Le médecin, philosophe mécanico-chimiste selon Étienne-François Geoffroy (1672-1731)
Making Lizards Into Drugs
Berzelian Formulas as Paper Tools in Early Nineteenth-Century Chemistry
Paper tools in experimental cultures
Chemical analysis and the domains of reality
Shifting ontologies, changing classifications
The Chemical Revolution revisited
Entering New Fields
Police Chemistry
The End of Alchemy
Etienne-François Geoffroy (1672-1731), a Chemist on the Frontiers
Dictionary of Scientific Biography
La formation de la pratique scientifique
The French Paracelsians
Pump and Circumstance
Georgius Agricola
Georgius Agricola
The Chemical Philosophy
Leviathan and the Air-Pump
The Crystallization of a New Narrative Form in Experimental Reports (1660-1690)
Origin of the Concept Chemical Compound
Filling the Space of Possibilities
The Chemical Philosophy
Eighteenth-Century Chemistry as an Investigative Enterprise
Leviathan and the Air-Pump
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,45 |
| Citation span | 1997 - 2020 (24) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |