From Science to Popularization, and Back - The Science and Journalism of the Belgian Economist Gustave de Molinari
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4516124 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Maarten Van Dijck (0000-0002-1140-9384, KU Leuven, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 377-402 |
| Publication date | 2008-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science in Context (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0269-8897 • E-ISSN: 1474-0664 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s026988970800183x |
| PMID | 19244854 |
| OpenAlex | W2100788146 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 29 |
ArgumentSociologists and historians of science, such as Richard Whitley and Stephen Hilgartner, identified a culturally dominant discourse of science popularization in the broader society. In this dominant view, a clear distinction is maintained between scientific knowledge and popularized knowledge. Popularization of science is seen as the process of transmitting real science to a lay public. This discourse on science popularization was criticized by Whitley and Hilgartner as an inadequate simplification. Yet, the battered traditional model of popularization remains remarkably resistant to these theoretical attacks. In this paper I will argue, based on research of the output of the Belgian economist Gustave de Molinari (1819-1912), and more specifically, his opinion on the role of government in economic life, that the boundary between science and popularization in political economy is not clear and that the status of scientists fluctuates over time and in different contexts. It is therefore impossible for historians or economists to distinguish science from popularization based on the essential characteristics or intrinsic quality of the work. De Molinari's ideas are followed through the different media of science and journalism. Although de Molinari himself differentiated between his scientific and "popular" work, the boundary between science and popularization proves to be highly permeable, in both directions
Art · Humanities · Journalism · Political science · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Historical Economic and Social Studies · Law
The Classical Economists Revisited
L'economie politique en France au XIXe siecle
Le Demon de la theorie
The popularization and excommunication of Fred Hoyle's “life-from-space” theory
Knowledge Producers and Knowledge Acquirers
The Spread of Political Economy and the Professionalisation of Economists
Studies in the History of French Political Economy
Public Understanding of Science
The Machinery Question and the Making of Political Economy 1815–1848
Economic Controversy in the British Reviews, 1802-1850
The Dominant View of Popularization
Cultural Boundaries of Science
Cent ans d'histoire sociale en Belgique
The London Economist and the High Tide of Laissez Faire
Adam Smith and Laissez Faire
Classical Economics Reconsidered
The Theory of Economic Policy in English Classical Political Economy
Popularizing Classical Economics
Studies in the History of French Political Economy
Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science
The Task of Explaining Sight - Helmholtz's Writings on Vision as a Test Case for Models of Science Popularization
The Meaning of Economic Liberalism in Mid-Nineteenth-Century France
Jean-Baptiste Say and Spontaneous Order
The Machinery Question and the Making of Political Economy, 1815-1848
The Theory of Economic Policy in English Classical Political Economy
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,13 |
| Citation span | 2011 - 2025 (15) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |