Building Transnational Bodies
Norway and the International Development of Laboratory Animal Science, ca. 1956-1980
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4516334 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tone Druglitrø (0000-0001-5210-2488, University of Oslo), Robert G W Kirk (0000-0002-6541-5915, University of Manchester) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 333-357 |
| Publication date | 2014-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science in Context (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0269-8897 • E-ISSN: 1474-0664 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s026988971400009x |
| PMID | 24941794 |
| OpenAlex | W2157410119 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 34 |
ArgumentThis article adopts a historical perspective to examine the development of Laboratory Animal Science and Medicine, an auxiliary field which formed to facilitate the work of the biomedical sciences by systematically improving laboratory animal production, provision, and maintenance in the post Second World War period. We investigate how Laboratory Animal Science and Medicine co-developed at the local level (responding to national needs and concerns) yet was simultaneously transnational in orientation (responding to the scientific need that knowledge, practices, objects and animals circulate freely). Adapting the work of Tsing (2004), we argue that national differences provided the creative "friction" that helped drive the formation of Laboratory Animal Science and Medicine as a transnational endeavor. Our analysis engages with the themes of this special issue by focusing on the development of Laboratory Animal Science and Medicine in Norway, which both informed wider transnational developments and was formed by them. We show that Laboratory Animal Science and Medicine can only be properly understood from a spatial perspective; whilst it developed and was structured through national "centers," its orientation was transnational necessitating international networks through which knowledge, practice, technologies, and animals circulated
Argument (complex analysis · Engineering ethics · Medical laboratory · Pathology · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Sociology · Work (physics · Computer Science · Engineering · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis · Medicine · Race, Genetics, and Society · Mechanical Engineering
Securing the Monkey Supply Chain
Pest Control and Ecology
Feral pharmaceuticalization—Biomedical uses of animal life in light of the global donkey hide trade
Were there long-term economic effects of exposure to polio vaccination? An analysis of migrants to Sweden 1946–2003
Procedural Care
Choreographies of co-modification
Locating the ‘culture wars’ in laboratory animal research
Edge cases in animal research law
Animal research nexus
Improvising care
Vermin, Victims and Disease
"Skilled Care" and the Making of Good Science
A good life? A good death? Reconciling care and harm in animal research
The Laboratory Revolution in Medicine
The Invisible Industrialist
Crafting Science
The Right Tools for the Job
Designs on Nature
Making Mice
Standards and their stories
Global Assemblages
Global Nature, Global Culture
Wanted—standard guinea pigs’
Postcolonial Technoscience
The World Health Organization and the Transition From “International” to “Global” Public Health
Science, Scientific Management, and the Transformation of Medicine in Britain c . 1870–1950
The Palgrave Dictionary of Transnational History
Subjected to Parliament
The Life of a Virus
Transnational Discourse
Contexts in Action-And the Future of the Past in STS
What is a Humanized Mouse? Remaking the Species and Spaces of Translational Medicine
Toward a Transnational History of Technology
Caring for the Multiple and the Multitude
Sciences and the Global
From Rodent Utopia to Urban Hell
Captivating Behaviour
A Brave New Animal for a Brave New World
Globality and Constructions of World Health
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,63 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |