Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Separating Spheres

Legal Ideology v. Paternity Testing in Divorce Cases

Bibliographic Data

ID4516497
AuthorsShari Rudavsky (corresponding author)
Year1999
Volume12
Issue1
Pages123-138
Publication date1999-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience in Context (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0269-8897 • E-ISSN: 1474-0664
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0269889700003331
OpenAlexW2021517936
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited18

The ArgumentBlood tests developed at the turn of the century could in some cases discern genetic relations. While such tests could never prove that a given individual had fathered a child in question, men of certain blood types could be exonerated from paternity of children with other blood types. Starting in the 1930s, scientists and lawmakers attempted to introduce such evidence into paternity or bastardy trials to attest to a man's innocence. Evidence from blood tests soon came to be used in divorce cases.Blood tests appeared to be ideal for providing relevant information in cases when divorcing men claimed as a part of their suit that they had not fathered their ex-wife's child or children. Nevertheless, the courts remained reluctant to intro duce such evidence in divorce cases. This paper will argue that reluctance derived not from a distrust of the science, but from the courts' clinging to a definition of paternity that was not rooted in genetic connection.Many judges and juries fell back on the pre-industrial assumption that once a man married a woman he was automatically the father of any children she bore. While this assumption flew in the face of scientific evidence, it did have the advantage of ensuring that the children of married women could not be bastard ized. The changing manner in which courts handled the tension between genetic paternity and traditional paternity in divorce cases reveals how society's views on paternity have evolved over the course of this century

Biology · Criminology · Distrust · Fell · Ideology · Innocence · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Wife · Chinese history and philosophy · Cuban History and Society · Law · Medicine · Psychology

  • Confidence of paternity, divorce, and investment in children by Albuquerque men

    Open Access•Kermyt G Anderson, H Kaplan et al.•Evolution and Human Behavior•2007

  • ‘Seeking for clarity in genetic science’

    Open Access•Zvikomborero M Robson, Charles Simbarashe Gozho et al.•Cogent Social Sciences•2024

  • Demographic correlates of paternity confidence and pregnancy outcomes among Albuquerque men

    Open Access•Kermyt G Anderson, H Kaplan et al.•American Journal of Physical…•2006

  • Bloodlines

    Open Access•Susan E Lederer•Journal of the Royal Anthropologica…•2013

  • In the Name of Eugenics

    Daniel J Kevles•In the Name of Eugenics•1998

  • Contested States

    Mindie Lazarus‐black, Mindie Lazarus-Black et al.•Contested States•2012

  • The Medicolegal Application of Blood Grouping Tests

    I Davidsohn•Journal of Criminal Law and…•1941

  • Expert Witnesses. Science, Medicine and the Practice of Law

    John Jackson, Carol A G Jones et al.•Journal of Law and Society•1995

  • California's Tangled Web

    William P Hoffman•Stanford Law Review•1968

  • Expert Witnesses

    Steve Taylor, Carol A G Jones et al.•British Journal of Sociology•1995

  • Divorce

    Patrick C Mckenry, Glenda Riley•Journal of Marriage and the Family•1992

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,2
Citation span2006 - 2024 (19)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae