Broadcasting Mainline Protestantism
The Chicago Sunday Evening Club and the Evolution of Audience Expectations from Radio to Television
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4517425 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Meelis Stamm (0000-0002-0090-008X, corresponding author), Michael Stamm (0000-0002-4126-8455) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 233-264 |
| Publication date | 2012-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religion and American Culture A Journal of Interpretation (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1052-1151 • E-ISSN: 1533-8568 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1525/rac.2012.22.2.233 |
| OpenAlex | W1927703622 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 35 |
This article analyzes the broadcast activities of the Chicago Sunday Evening Club (CSEC), a mainline Protestant organization founded in 1908 and still active today. The CSEC began broadcasting its weekly meetings on the radio in 1922 and on television in 1956. Drawing on archival organizational records from the CSEC and from listener correspondence, this essay traces how the club's use of the new media of particular historical moments shaped its history as a public entity.This study makes two claims. First, it argues that, though evangelicals and fundamentalists took to radio and television broadcasting with greater vigor, mainline Protestant groups did as well, and the persistence of a group like the CSEC offers a way to understand the challenges that broadcasting presented to religious organizations. Second, this article shows how audience expectations for religious programming evolved from radio to television. For many listeners, radio offered what they told the CSEC was a spiritual and even miraculous experience, and they marveled at being able to tune in to religious services from their homes. Television, however, prompted remarks often focused on visual style, and the club found itself struggling to compete with the newly emerging group of religious television programs not only on denominational terms (many were evangelicals and fundamentalists) but also on aesthetic terms. In contrast to radio, as many viewers wrote to the CSEC, television seemed to provide not a singular "experience" but rather spectatorial access to events taking place elsewhere. In the context of competition from the more telegenic programming of evangelicals and fundamentalists, these shifting audience expectations shaped both the history of the CSEC as a public entity and the broader history of mainline Protestantism in the mass media
Advertising · Art · Business · Club · Literature · Media studies · Political science · Protestantism · Public broadcasting · Sociology · Television studies · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Computer Science · History · Law · Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
Voices of protest
The Politics of Authenticity
Radio voices
American Mainline Religion
Land of Desire
Urban Masses and Moral Order in America, 1820-1920
Aimee Semple Mcpherson and the Resurrection of Christian America
The varieties of religious experience
Speaking into the Air
Amusing ourselves to death
The Man Everybody Knew
Uncertain Victory
The Restructuring of American Religion
Pray TV
Cold War, Cool Medium
The End of American Innocence
Fireside Politics
Fifties Television
The Man Everybody Knew
Imagined communities
The Secular RevolutionPower, Interests, and Conflict in the Secularization of American Public Life
No Place of Grace
We Have Heard the Joyful Sound
The Social Significance of Religious Television
The Culture of Liberal Protestant Progressivism, 1875-1925
Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism
Religious Television
Religious Television
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |