Fortune Telling and American Religious Freedom
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4517492 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Charles Mccrary (0000-0001-8913-4512, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 269-306 |
| Publication date | 2018-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religion and American Culture A Journal of Interpretation (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1052-1151 • E-ISSN: 1533-8568 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1525/rac.2018.28.2.269 |
| OpenAlex | W2804907612 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 43 |
In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, a number of people who were arrested for pretending telling fortunes appealed their convictions on religious freedom grounds. These accused fortune tellers, mostly white spiritualist women, were arrested for violating state statutes across the United States, from New York to Georgia to Oklahoma to Washington. Though each defendant lost her case, their arguments showcase previously understudied early twentieth-century attempts by relatively disempowered actors to expand the scope of religious freedom. One law professor, named Blewett Lee, wrote a series of articles in the 1920s in which he considered these cases and their implications, identifying central problems and advancing prescient arguments about religious freedom.This article thinks with Lee and the accused fortune tellers to highlight two key aspects of secularism and American religious freedom. First, it uncovers the epistemological assumptions embedded into jurisprudence and legislation around "fortune telling." Many of the statutes, which were based on English vagrancy laws, applied to "persons pretending to tell fortunes." The term "pretending" raised questions about what the law presumed to be true and whether secular states could adjudicate religious veracity. Second, this article argues that secularism is regulatory and that scholars should connect religious freedom to histories of policing, licensure, and other forms of regulation. These two aspects, one primarily conceptual and the other practical and procedure, work together to delineate the parameters of American religious freedom, as secular state agents both define "religious belief" and regulate believers
Adjudication · Jurisprudence · Legislation · Political science · Religious freedom · Secular state · Secularism · Separation of church and state · Sociology · Statute · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Religion and Society Interactions · Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment
Poverty and policy in Tudor and Stuart England
Cast Out
Religion as a Category of Governance and Sovereignty
A History of the Criminal Law of England
The Limits of Tolerance
We Have a Religion
The Spirits and the Law
Ghosts of Futures Past
A Ministry of Presence
Beyond Religious Freedom
Judging Religious Sincerity
Beyond Religious Freedom
Black MagicReligion and the African American Conjuring Tradition
The Specter of the Indian
Freedom with Violence
A Secular Age
The Invention of Religion in Japan
The Myth of Disenchantment
Formations of the Secular
Powers of the Secular Modern
Masterless Men
The Superstition, Secularism, and Religion Trinary
International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society
A History of Vagrants and Vagrancy and Beggars and Begging
Seriously, What Does "Taking Religion Seriously" Mean
The Republic Unsettled
The Humbug in American Religion
The protestant secular in the study of American religion
Masterless Men
The Invention of World Religions
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |